Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31050662›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

How Dendrites Affect Online Recognition Memory.

Xundong Wu, Gabriel C Mel, D J Strouse, Bartlett W Mel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xundong WuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6643-4384
Gabriel C MelComputer Science Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0846-7994
D J StrousePhysics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Bartlett W MelBiomedical Engineering Department and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-4716
University of Southern California · USHangzhou Dianzi University · CNPrinceton University · US

Funding

In Vitro and Modeling Studies of Synaptic IntegrationR01MH065918 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MEL, BARTLETT W · 2003 to 2007
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to record the stream of autobiographical information that defines our unique personal history, our brains must form durable memories from single brief exposures to the patterned stimuli that impinge on them continuously throughout life. However, little is known about the computational strategies or neural mechanisms that underlie the brain's ability to perform this type of "online" learning. Based on increasing evidence that dendrites act as both signaling and learning units in the brain, we developed an analytical model that relates online recognition memory capacity to roughly a dozen dendritic, network, pattern, and task-related parameters. We used the model to determine what dendrite size maximizes storage capacity under varying assumptions about pattern density and noise level. We show that over a several-fold range of both of these parameters, and over multiple orders-of-magnitude of memory size, capacity is maximized when dendrites contain a few hundred synapses-roughly the natural number found in memory-related areas of the brain. Thus, in comparison to entire neurons, dendrites increase storage capacity by providing a larger number of better-sized learning units. Our model provides the first normative theory that explains how dendrites increase the brain's capacity for online learning; predicts which combinations of parameter settings we should expect to find in the brain under normal operating conditions; leads to novel interpretations of an array of existing experimental results; and provides a tool for understanding which changes associated with neurological disorders, aging, or stress are most likely to produce memory deficits-knowledge that could eventually help in the design of improved clinical treatments for memory loss.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainComputer SimulationDendritesHumansLearningMemoryModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsRecognition, PsychologySynapses

Identifiers

PMID31050662
PMCPMC6527246
OpenAlexW2942875436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.