Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31050648›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Cerebellar Purkinje cells control eye movements with a rapid rate code that is invariant to spike irregularity.

Hannah L Payne, Ranran L French, Christine C Guo, Td Barbara Nguyen-Vu, Tiina Manninen, Jennifer L Raymond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Parsing auditory neural code into maximum-entropy packets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Control Posture in Larval Zebrafish (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah L PayneDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-5706
Ranran L FrenchDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-0223
Christine C GuoMental Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-0172
Td Barbara Nguyen-VuDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4708-1982
Tiina ManninenDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0456-1185
Jennifer L RaymondDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8145-747X

Funding

VESTIBULAR AND VISUAL CONTROL OF EYE MOVEMENTR01DC004154 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDMAN, MARK S, RAYMOND, JENNIFER L · 1999 to 2025
$9.6M
Instructive Signals for Motor LearningR01NS072406 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer L Raymond · 2010 to 2026
$7.6M
VECTOR COREP30NS069375 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAMLOO, MEHRDAD · 2011 to 2019
$6.3M
Academy of Finland 315795Academy of Finland 320072National Science Foundation 0801700National Science Foundation DGE-114747NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004154NIH HHS P30-NS069375NIH HHS R01-DC04154NIH HHS R01-NS072406NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS069375NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072406Stanford University DARE Doctoral Fellowship Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rate and temporal pattern of neural spiking each have the potential to influence computation. In the cerebellum, it has been hypothesized that the irregularity of interspike intervals in Purkinje cells affects their ability to transmit information to downstream neurons. Accordingly, during oculomotor behavior in mice and rhesus monkeys, mean irregularity of Purkinje cell spiking varied with mean eye velocity. However, moment-to-moment variations revealed a tight correlation between eye velocity and spike rate, with no additional information conveyed by spike irregularity. Moreover, when spike rate and irregularity were independently controlled using optogenetic stimulation, the eye movements elicited were well-described by a linear population rate code with 3-5 ms temporal precision. Biophysical and random-walk models identified biologically realistic parameter ranges that determine whether spike irregularity influences responses downstream. The results demonstrate cerebellar control of movements through a remarkably rapid rate code, with no evidence for an additional contribution of spike irregularity.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsEye MovementsAnimalsMacaca mulattaMiceOptogeneticsPhotic StimulationPurkinje CellsTime Factorscerebellumeye movementsirregularitymouseneurosciencePurkinje cellrate coderhesus macaquetemporal code

Identifiers

PMID31050648
PMCPMC6499540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.