Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31050355›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study.

Ekaterina Gibiansky, Leonid Gibiansky, Vincent Buchheit, Nicolas Frey, Michael Brewster, Günter Fingerle-Rowson, Candice Jamois

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibody Therapy for Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies: Past and Present.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Antibody Drug Clearance: An Underexplored Marker of Outcomes with Checkpoint Inhibitors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ekaterina GibianskyQuantPharm LLC, North Potomac, MD, USA.
Leonid GibianskyQuantPharm LLC, North Potomac, MD, USA.
Vincent BuchheitPharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nicolas FreyPharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael BrewsterClinical Development, Roche Innovation Center Welwyn, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Günter Fingerle-RowsonPharma Development Clinical Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Candice JamoisPharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-9687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRituximab is standard care in a number of lymphoma subtypes, including follicular lymphoma (FL), although many patients are resistant to rituximab, or develop resistance with repeated treatment, and a high proportion relapse. Obinutuzumab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with improved efficacy over rituximab. It is approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), and for use with bendamustine in patients with rituximab-relapsed/refractory FL.

methodsUsing a previously described population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of obinutuzumab in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and CLL, we conducted an exposure-response analysis using data from 6 clinical trials in patients with CD20+ B-cell malignancies (CLL11, GADOLIN, GATHER, GAUDI, GAUGUIN and GAUSS) to describe the PK properties of obinutuzumab, identify covariates influencing exposure, and explore how exposure affects safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics.

resultsA 2-compartment model with linear and time-dependent clearance described obinutuzumab PK. Disease type and subtype, body weight, baseline tumour size, and sex had the largest effects on PK. Obinutuzumab exposure was not associated with occurrence or severity of adverse events, but higher exposure appeared to be associated with greater efficacy, particularly longer progression-free survival. However, in multivariate Cox regression analysis, progression-free survival benefit in the obinutuzumab plus bendamustine arm was independent of exposure.

conclusionThe updated population PK model reported here accurately describes the PK of obinutuzumab patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and CLL. The selected obinutuzumab dosing regimen offers clinical benefit in a majority of rituximab-refractory FL patients treated with bendamustine, irrespective of variability in exposure, whilst minimising adverse events.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBendamustine HydrochlorideDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansLymphoma, FollicularMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBendamustine HydrochlorideobinutuzumabRituximabdrug exposurefollicular lymphomaobinutuzumabpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID31050355
PMCPMC6710522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.