Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31050056›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2019

Implementation of the Adductor Strengthening Programme: Players primed for adoption but reluctant to maintain - A cross-sectional study.

Joar Harøy, Espen Guldahl Wiger, Roald Bahr, Thor Einar Andersen

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ExtendedBritish journal of sports medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Neuromuscular Effects of the Copenhagen Adductor Exercise: A Systematic Review.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joar HarøyDepartment of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-637X
Espen Guldahl WigerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Roald BahrDepartment of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-4237
Thor Einar AndersenDepartment of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center · NO

Funding

International Olympic CommitteeNorsk Tipping ASNorwegian Olympic Committee & Confederation of SportRoyal Norwegian Ministry of CultureSouth-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groin injuries represent a considerable problem in male football, accounting for 4%-19% of all time-loss injuries. The Adductor Strengthening Programme is the first groin-specific prevention program shown to reduce the risk of groin problems. We aimed to use the RE-AIM framework to examine the players' experiences with the implementation of the program and player attitude toward groin injury prevention in football. Of the 632 players involved in the trial examining the effect of the Adductor Strengthening Programme, 501 agreed to participate in a survey at the end of the season. Most players thought that footballers are at moderate to high risk for groin injuries (87%) and that there is a need for preventive measures (96%). They also believed that a preventive program with strengthening exercises would reduce the risk of groin injuries (91%). Majority of the players reported using <5 minutes to complete the program (73%), and only 11% wanted additional exercises. However, only 46% reported to have performed the program as recommended, and an even smaller proportion (31%) planned to continue using it as recommended the next season. Our results suggest that footballers believe that prevention of groin injuries is needed. Attitude toward implementation of the Adductor Strengthening Programme was positive, and the single-exercise approach was considered an important facilitator. However, in future dissemination of the program, the players' reluctance to maintain the exercise protocol may be a potential barrier to implementation that should be addressed.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAthletesAthletic InjuriesCross-Sectional StudiesGroinHumansMaleSoccerSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultattitudesfootballgroin injuryimplementationinjury prevention

Identifiers

PMID31050056
PMCPMC6851742
OpenAlexW2943813956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.