Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049954›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied behavior analysis2019

Resurgence as Choice: Implications for promoting durable behavior change.

Brian D Greer, Timothy A Shahan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05790668 (Motivational Refinements for Facilitating Reinforcement Schedule Thinning), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05790668 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Motivational Refinements for Facilitating Reinforcement Schedule Thinning

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2023 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsDecreasing Destructive Behavior, Increasing Functional Communicative BehaviorArmsTraditional Schedule Thinning, PIA-Informed Schedule Thinning, PIA-Informed Schedule Thinning with Competing Stimuli
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Human-operant evaluation of synthesized alternative reinforcement and resurgence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Need to Distinguish between "Lapse" and "Relapse".Perspectives on behavior science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Examining resurgence in rats following expanded-operant treatments.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Relapse and its mitigation: Toward behavioral inoculation.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Basic and applied research on extinction bursts.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian D GreerUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute.
Timothy A ShahanUtah State University.

Funding

Basic and Clinical Studies in Reinforcing Positive Behaviors in Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesR01HD093734 · NICHD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy A Shahan · 2018 to 2026
$5.2M
Stimulus Control Refinements of Functional Communication Training in IDR01HD079113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, WAYNE WILLIAM · 2014 to 2023
$4.5M
Preventing relapse of destructive behavior using behavioral momentum theoryR01HD083214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, WAYNE WILLIAM · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079113NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083214NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurgence is an increase in a previously suppressed behavior resulting from a worsening in reinforcement conditions for current behavior. Resurgence is often observed following successful treatment of problem behavior with differential reinforcement when reinforcement for an alternative behavior is subsequently omitted or reduced. The efficacy of differential reinforcement has long been conceptualized in terms of quantitative models of choice between concurrent operants (i.e., the matching law). Here, we provide an overview of a novel quantitative model of resurgence called Resurgence as Choice (RaC), which suggests that resurgence results from these same basic choice processes. We review the failures of the only other quantitative model of resurgence (i.e., Behavioral Momentum Theory) and discuss its shortcomings with respect to the limited range of circumstances about which it makes predictions in applied settings. Finally, we describe how RaC overcomes these shortcomings and discuss implications of the model for promoting durable behavior change.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorRecurrenceBehavior ControlHumansModels, PsychologicalReinforcement, Psychologychoicedifferential reinforcementproblem behaviorrelapseresurgence

Identifiers

PMID31049954
PMCPMC6625346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.