ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2019
A model for mapping between the human and rodent cerebral cortex.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elaborating the connections of a closed-loop forebrain circuit in the rat: Circumscribed evidence for novel topography within a cortico-striato-pallidal triple descending projection, with thalamic feedback, to the anterior lateral hypothalamic area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- A Cross-Species Neuroimaging Study of Sex Chromosome Dosage Effects on Human and Mouse Brain Anatomy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- The brainstem connectome database.Scientific data · 2022Article
- An open access mouse brain flatmap and upgraded rat and human brain flatmaps based on current reference atlases.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2021Article
- Structure-function subsystem models of female and male forebrain networks integrating cognition, affect, behavior, and bodily functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.