Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049836›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics - open2019

A Systematic Review of the Health Economics of Pompe Disease.

Benedikt Schoser, Andreas Hahn, Emma James, Digant Gupta, Matthew Gitlin, Suyash Prasad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Phase I study of liver depot gene therapy in late-onset Pompe disease.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt SchoserFriedrich-Baur-Institut, Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. benedikt.schoser@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-8131
Andreas HahnDepartment of Child Neurology, University of Giessen, Feulgenstrasse 12, 35385, Giessen, Germany.
Emma JamesAudentes Therapeutics, 600 California Street, Floor 17, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.
Digant GuptaBridge Medical Consulting Ltd, Gainsborough House, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, London, UK.
Matthew GitlinBluePath Solutions, 10951 West Pico Blvd, Suite 120, Los Angeles, CA, 90064, USA.
Suyash PrasadAudentes Therapeutics, 600 California Street, Floor 17, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPompe disease is a rare, severe neuromuscular disease with high mortality and substantial clinical and humanistic burden. However, the economic burden of Pompe disease and the health economic value of its treatments are not well understood. The objectives of this systematic review were to characterize the health economic evidence on Pompe disease, including healthcare resource use and costs (direct and indirect), health utilities, and the cost-effectiveness of current treatments used to manage patients with Pompe disease.

methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE

resultsEight publications evaluated patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) (two studies), late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) (four studies), or both (two studies). In IOPD, total cost of supportive therapy (excluding treatment) was €32,871 (equivalent to US$41,667 when adjusted for currency and inflation to 2017 US dollars) over a life expectancy of 0.4 years. In adult LOPD, the average annual cost per patient of supportive therapy was €22,475 (adjusted $28,489). Resource use in LOPD was high, with nursing home admissions accounting for 19% of annual direct medical costs. Health economic evaluations estimating incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT) versus supportive therapy ranged from £109,991 (adjusted, $186,851) per QALY gained in Columbia to €1,043,868 (adjusted, $1,323,207) in the Netherlands. DISCUSSION: Despite a full systematic literature search, only eight relevant publications were identified, most of which were of relatively poor quality. However, a significant economic burden of Pompe disease on patients, families, healthcare systems, and society was found, with the majority of costs driven by the only currently approved treatment, ERT. Health economic evaluations of ERT versus supportive therapy vary significantly, with the majority well above willingness-to-pay thresholds. New therapies and approaches to care are needed to address the persistent and lifelong economic burden of Pompe disease and the large incremental cost-effectiveness ratios observed.

Identifiers

PMID31049836
PMCPMC6861413
OpenAlexW2942619274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.