Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049806›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020

Limbic and cortical control of phonation for speech in response to a public speech preparation stressor.

Maria Dietrich, Richard D Andreatta, Yang Jiang, Joseph C Stemple

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Integrating Advances in Personality Science to Re-Examine the Trait Theory of Voice Disorders.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  4. Early Insights Into the Role of Personality in Adherence to Voice Rest After Phonomicrosurgery.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrative Review and Framework of Suggested Mechanisms in Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria DietrichDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Missouri, 308 Lewis Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. dietrichm@health.missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-5371
Richard D AndreattaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky, 120 Wethington Bldg, 900 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
Yang JiangDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, 113 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
Joseph C StempleDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky, 120 Wethington Bldg, 900 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Missouri Health System · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001998NCRR NIH HHS UL1TR001998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge on brain networks subserving vocalization in vocally healthy individuals under various task conditions is scarce but paramount to understand voice disorders. The aims of our study were to determine (1) the effect of social-evaluative stress on the central neural control of phonation underlying speech production; and (2) the neural signature, personality profile, and aerodynamic vocal function in relation to salivary cortisol responses. Thirteen vocally healthy females underwent an event-related sparse-sampling fMRI protocol consisting of voiced and whispered sentence productions with and without exposure to the social-evaluative stressor public speaking anticipation. Participants completed a personality questionnaire, rating scales of negative emotional state, and provided salivary cortisol samples. In the total sample, the task contrast of voiced productions revealed that stressor exposure resulted in a peak activation in the right caudate with concomitant deactivations in the bilateral pgACC and aMCC, and right IFG, BA 9, BA 10, insula, putamen, and thalamus. There were individual differences in stressor-induced brain activations as a function of stress reactivity with greater cortisol reactivity linked with lower laryngeal motor cortex activity and lower scores on aspects of extraversion. Our data confirm that stress alters the phonatory control for speech production through limbic-motor interactions. The findings support the Trait Theory of Voice Disorders (Roy and Bless 2000) and help provide critical insights to the study of voice disorders such as primary muscle tension dysphonia.

Indexed as

DysphoniaVoiceFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhonationSpeechFunctional MRILarynxLimbicMuscle tension dysphoniaStressVoice disorders

Identifiers

PMID31049806
PMCPMC7572327
OpenAlexW2942943353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.