Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049762›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2019

Outcomes of infliximab dose escalation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Stanley B Cohen, Joel M Kremer, Kimberly J Dandreo, George W Reed, Robert Magner, Ying Shan, Shelly Kafka, Raphael J DeHoratius, Lorie Ellis, Dennis Parenti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stanley B CohenMetroplex Clinical Research Center, 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 800, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA. arthdoc@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-979X
Joel M KremerThe Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, 4 Tower Place, 8th Floor, Albany, NY, 12203, USA.
Kimberly J DandreoCorrona, LLC, 1440 Main Street, Suite 310, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
George W ReedCorrona, LLC, 1440 Main Street, Suite 310, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Robert MagnerUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Ying ShanCorrona, LLC, 1440 Main Street, Suite 310, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Shelly KafkaJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.
Raphael J DeHoratiusJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.
Lorie EllisJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.
Dennis ParentiJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.

Funding

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDose escalation of infliximab in both primary and secondary nonresponders is widely reported; however, the usefulness of dose escalation has been disputed. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate trends in clinical efficacy following multiple infliximab dose escalations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsPatients enrolled in a US RA registry were included if they initiated infliximab at 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks, received ≥ 1 infliximab dose escalation within 12 months of initiation, and had ≥ 1 visit following dose escalation. Trends in mean Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores from visits following dose escalations were evaluated.

resultsIn patients who received 2 or 3 dose escalations, the initial (1 or 2) dose escalations resulted in reduced mean CDAI scores, but subsequent escalations did not further reduce disease activity. In patients who received ≥ 4 dose escalations, mean CDAI scores did not further reduce disease activity over time. Mean HAQ scores were stable over time in patients who received 2 or 3 dose escalations. In patients who received ≥ 4 dose escalations, mean HAQ scores decreased following 1 dose escalation but progressively increased following subsequent dose escalations.

conclusionInitial dose escalations (from 3 mg/kg to the equivalent of approximately 5 to 7 mg/kg) may be useful in controlling disease activity; however, there may be diminishing clinical benefit of further escalations, which can also increase the potential risk for infection and increase incremental drug costs. KEY POINTS: • Initial infliximab dose escalations (1 to 2) may be useful in lowering disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • There does not appear to be a clinical benefit in infliximab dose escalations above the equivalent of 5 to 7 mg/kg.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsDose escalationInfliximabPatient registryRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.