ArticleArchives of women's mental health2020
Psychometric aspects of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: data from the HAPPY study.
Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Greek Version of Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale (TPDS).Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Factors associated with the intention of pregnant women to give birth with epidural analgesia: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Article
- [Factors influencing pregnancy stress in pregnant women in Korea: a cross-sectional study].Korean journal of women health nursing · 2022Article
- The COVID-19 outbreak increases maternal stress during pregnancy, but not the risk for postpartum depression.Archives of women's mental health · 2021Article
- Psychometric adequacy of the Persian adapted version of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale (P-TPDS).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Development of the COVID-19 Perinatal Perception Questionnaire (COVID19-PPQ).Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2021Article
- Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Online mindfulness-based intervention for women with pregnancy distress: design of a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously developed the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale (TPDS). The aim of the current study was to further assess its test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and concurrent validity in 1739 pregnant women. TPDS scores during pregnancy were highly inter-correlated (r ≥ .70), with similar findings for its Negative Affect and Partner Involvement subscales. Pregnancy and delivery worries varied in different subgroups of women regarding their obstetric history. Nullipara reported more pregnancy- and delivery-related worries at all trimesters of pregnancy. Women with previous pregnancy-related complications reported more pregnancy-related worries, and those with previous delivery-related problems reported more delivery-related worries than women without these problems in the past. The TPDS seems to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess pregnancy-specific distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.