Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049650›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2019

Magnetic resonance and retrograde endoscopic cholangiopancreatography-based identification of biliary tree variants: are there type-related variabilities among the Saudi population?

Asma Fahd Al-Muhanna, Abdelhamied Mohamed Lutfi, Abdulrahman Hamad Al-Abdulwahhab, Abdulaziz Mohammad Al-Sharydah, Abdulaziz Al-Quorain, Afnan Fahd Al-Muhanna, Bander Fuhaid Al-Dhaferi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Asma Fahd Al-MuhannaAnatomy Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, P.O. Box 31952, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. afalmuhanna@iau.edu.sa.
Abdelhamied Mohamed LutfiAnatomy Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, P.O. Box 31952, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Hamad Al-AbdulwahhabRadiology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Mohammad Al-SharydahRadiology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Al-QuorainInternal Medicine Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Afnan Fahd Al-MuhannaRadiology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Bander Fuhaid Al-DhaferiRadiology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Fahd Hospital of the University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated biliary tree patterns in a Saudi Arabian population to identify common anatomical variations to establish a common ground for improved surgical practice and to avoid unexpected complications. We consider this type of investigation clinically important because the findings are valuable for pre-surgical planning in a broad range of procedures, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy and liver transplantation.

methodsWe conducted an imaging-based retrospective cross-sectional study involving 150 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for different indications at King Fahd Hospital of the University between January 2011 and December 2014.

resultsTypical right hepatic duct (RHD) tributaries were observed in 56% of patients and typical left hepatic duct (LHD) anatomy was detected in 81.4% of patients. The typical anatomical pattern for the cystic duct was found in 72% of patients.

conclusionsOur findings showed that types A1 and A3b were the two most common variations in the RHD, whereas those in LHD were types B1 (segment IV duct opens to the LHD), and B2 (segment IV duct opens to the common hepatic duct separately). Although the angular type was the most prevalent among cystic duct variations, there were many differences in the types of variations observed. The findings somewhat correlated with those of other studies, suggesting that the normal biliary tree anatomy is similar among the Saudi population and in other ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedBiliary TractChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaYoung AdultBiliary tree anatomyERCPMRCPSaudi ArabiaVariation

Identifiers

PMID31049650
OpenAlexW2942711598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.