Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049636›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019

[Molecular tumor board in uro-oncology-from a pathologist's view].

N T Gaisa, G Kristiansen, S Perner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N T GaisaInstitut für Pathologie, Uniklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. ngaisa@ukaachen.de.
G KristiansenInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
S PernerPathologie, Forschungszentrum Borstel, Leibniz Lungenzentrum, Borstel, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides evidence- and guideline-based tumor therapy, personalized targeted therapies within study settings or individual experimental settings in advanced cancers without further therapeutic options are emerging. A comprehensive molecular analysis of the tumor in a molecular pathology laboratory is important for all targeted therapy approaches. However, the interpretation of the molecular results is crucial and potential therapeutic conclusions can only be drawn by considering the clinical situation and within a setting of oncological experience. Therefore, the molecular results and their potential impact have to be discussed at a molecular tumor board, an interdisciplinary expert team consisting of clinicians, oncologists, (molecular) pathologists, systems physicians, study teams and where required geneticists. If the molecular tumor board decides a targeted therapeutic approach is appropriate, patients should be enrolled in studies or registries with controlled settings and documentation in order to evaluate the therapeutic concepts. Furthermore, molecular-based individual experimental therapies are possible within extreme clinical situations.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyPathologistsPathology, MolecularUrologic NeoplasmsUrologistsGenetic TestingHumansInterdisciplinary ResearchNeoplasmsPatient Care TeamPrecision MedicineInterdisciplinary expert teamMolecular pathologyNext generation sequencingStudy enrollmentTargeted therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.