Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049616›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2020

Commensal Staphylococci Including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Dogs and Cats in Remote New South Wales, Australia.

Gemma C Ma, Kate A Worthing, Michael P Ward, Jacqueline M Norris

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negativeOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Epidemiology of Animal-Associated Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gemma C MaSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kate A WorthingSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael P WardSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jacqueline M NorrisSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. jacqui.norris@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococci are important opportunistic pathogens in human and veterinary medicine in addition to being part of the normal flora of the skin and mucous membranes of mammals and birds. The rise of antimicrobial resistance amongst staphylococci warrants closer investigation of the diversity of skin commensal organisms-including coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS)-due to their potential as a source of resistance genes. This study is aimed at characterising the commensal staphylococci-including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species (spp.)-from mucocutaneous sites of dogs and cats from remote New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Pet dogs and cats were recruited from participants in a community companion animal health programme in six communities in western NSW. Three swabs were collected from each animal (anterior nares, oropharynx, and perineum) and from skin lesions or wounds if present and cultured on selective media for Staphylococcus spp. In total, 383 pets (303 dogs, 80 cats) were enrolled. Staphylococcus spp. were isolated from 67.3% of dogs and 73.8% of cats (494 isolates). The diversity of CoNS was high (20 species) whilst only three coagulase-positive spp. were isolated (S. pseudintermedius, S. aureus, S. intermedius). The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in dogs was high (2.6%) relative to other studies but was only a small proportion of overall commensal staphylococci. No cats carried MRSA and no MRSP was isolated from either species. Dogs were significantly more likely to carry coagulase-positive staphylococci than cats (P < 0.001). Amongst dogs, males and those with skin lesions were more likely to carry S. pseudintermedius. This study highlights important differences in the diversity and patterns of carriage of commensal staphylococci between dogs and cats in remote NSW, Australia.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatsDisease ReservoirsDogsMethicillinMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNew South WalesPetsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillinCatCommensalDogMRSAStaphylococcus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.