ArticleHealth science reports2019
Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.
Article in Health science reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Bevacizumab in real-life patients with recurrent glioblastoma: benefit or futility?Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Review
- The Monoterpenoid Perillyl Alcohol: Anticancer Agent and Medium to Overcome Biological Barriers.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Regorafenib in Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Large and Monocentric Real-Life Study.Cancers · 2021Article
- Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective cohort study.CNS oncology · 2021Article
- Bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: a single institution retrospective analysis on 92 patients.La Radiologia medica · 2021Article
- Current Advances in Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
- Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.Health science reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThis retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real-world setting.
methodsAdult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected.
resultsSeventy-four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5-58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8-∞). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6-16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8-12.5) in those who did (
conclusionsTreatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real-world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.