Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049419›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2019

Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.

Annick Desjardins, James E Herndon, Frances McSherry, Arliene Ravelo, Eric S Lipp, Patrick Healy, Katherine B Peters, John H Sampson, Dina Randazzo, Nicolas Sommer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Annick DesjardinsThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3869-8283
James E HerndonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.
Frances McSherryDuke Cancer Institute Biostatistics Durham North Carolina.
Arliene RaveloHealth Economics and Outcomes Research US Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc South San Francisco California.
Eric S LippThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.
Patrick HealyDuke Cancer Institute Biostatistics Durham North Carolina.
Katherine B PetersThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.
John H SampsonThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.
Dina RandazzoThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.
Nicolas SommerHealth Economics and Outcomes Research US Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc South San Francisco California.
Allan H FriedmanThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.
Henry S FriedmanThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-032X
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThis retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real-world setting.

methodsAdult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected.

resultsSeventy-four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5-58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8-∞). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6-16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8-12.5) in those who did (

conclusionsTreatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real-world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

bevacizumabreal‐world settingrecurrent glioblastomasurvivaltreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID31049419
PMCPMC6482327
OpenAlexW2913851162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.