Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049412›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2019

Feasibility of delivering integrated COPD-asthma care at primary and secondary level public healthcare facilities in Pakistan: a process evaluation.

Muhammad Amir Khan, Muhammad Ahmar Khan, John D Walley, Nida Khan, Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh, Saima Ali, Ehsan Salahuddin, Rebecca King, Shaheer Ellahi Khan, Farooq Manzoor and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad Amir KhanChief Coordinating Professional, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ahmar KhanResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
John D WalleyProfessor of International Public Health, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nida KhanProject Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Faisal Imtiaz SheikhResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Saima AliResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ehsan SalahuddinResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rebecca KingLecturer, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Shaheer Ellahi KhanAssistant Professor, Humanities and Social Sciences Department, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Farooq ManzoorProvincial Manager, Non-Communicable Disease Control Program, Punjab, Pakistan.
Haroon Jehangir KhanDirector, NCD & Mental Health, Directorate General of Health Services, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Pakistan,the estimated prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are 2.1% and 4.3% respectively, and existing care is grossly lacking both in coverage and quality. An integrated approach is recommended for delivering COPD and asthma care at public health facilities.

aimTo understand how an integrated care package was experienced by care providers and patients, and to inform modifications prior to scaling up. DESIGN &

settingThe mixed-methods study was conducted as part of cluster randomised trials on integrated COPD and asthma care at 30 public health facilities.

methodThe care practices were assessed by analysing the clinical records of

resultsUtilisation of public health facilities for chronic lung conditions was low, mainly because of the non-availability of inhalers. When diagnosed, around two-thirds (69%) of male and more than half (55%) of female patients had severe airway obstruction. The practice of prescribing inhalers differed between intervention and control arms. Patient non-adherence to follow-up visits remained a major treatment challenge (though attrition was lower and slower in the intervention arm). Around half of the male responders who smoked at baseline reported having quit smoking.

conclusionThe integrated care of chronic lung conditions at public health facilities is feasible and leads to improved diagnosis and treatment in a low-income country setting. The authors recommend scaling of the intervention with continued implementation research, especially on improving patient adherence to treatment.

Indexed as

AsthmaCOPDIntegrated caremixed method researchpublic health facilities

Identifiers

PMID31049412
PMCPMC6480853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.