Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049179›Full record

ArticleMiddle East journal of digestive diseases2019

Evaluation of the Additive Effect of Domperidone on Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease; A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.

Tarang Taghvaei, Arash Kazemi, Vahid Hosseini, Mehdi Hamidian, Hafez Tirgar Fakheri, Seyyed Abbas Hashemi, Iradj Maleki

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Middle East journal of digestive diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tarang TaghvaeiAssociate Professor of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Arash KazemiAssistant Professor of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Vahid HosseiniAssociate Professor of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mehdi HamidianFellow of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Hafez Tirgar FakheriProfessor of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Seyyed Abbas HashemiAssistant Professor of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Iradj MalekiAssociate Professor of Gastroenterology, Gut and Liver Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem with annoying symptoms. It is associated with negative impact on quality of life. Prokinetic agents may be used in combination with acid suppression agents as an adjunctive in patients with GERD refractory to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy, rather than as sole treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combination of PPI with domperidone (a prokinetic agent) compared with PPI alone in the treatment of patients with refractory GERD. METHODS This study was a double blind clinical trial on 29 patients with GERD refractory to PPI during the period of one month. By randomization, the patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated by pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily and domperidone three times a day for a month, while group B was treated by pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily and placebo three times a day. In this study endoscopy was performed to evaluate the prevalence of erosive esophagitis, non-erosive reflux, and hiatal hernia. Manometry was conducted to study the prevalence of dysmotility. GERD symptom questionnaires including the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Carlson Dennett, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 health survey (SF36) were used before and after treatment for screening GERD and assessing treatment response. RESULTS There were 17 (58.62%) women and 12 (41.37%) men. The prevalence of erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux, was 10.34% and 89.66%, respectively. There was a significant difference comparing reflux symptoms before and after treatment between the two groups according to reflux and Carlson Dennett questionnaires. At the end of the study, symptoms of reflux significantly improved by treatment. Although, the quality of life questionnaire scores improved by treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in response to treatment between the two groups. CONCLUSION In this research, we showed that adding domperidone to PPI could not make any improvement in patients with refractory reflux regarding the quality of life and improving the symptoms.

Indexed as

DomperidonePPIRefractory GERDTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31049179
PMCPMC6488498
OpenAlexW2908347040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.