Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049146›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal

Statins: Then and Now.

Peter P Toth, Maciej Banach

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Non-statin Lipid Therapies: A Narrative Review of Evolving Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  5. Genetic Biomarkers for Statin-Induced Myopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Statins: Beneficial Effects in Treatment of COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter P TothCGH MEDICAL CENTER, STERLING, ILLINOIS.
Maciej BanachMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF ŁÓDŹ, POLISH MOTHER'S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, ŁÓDŹ, POLAND.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USPolish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors) is a consequence of the highly targeted, arduous search for naturally occurring compounds that inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis. An enormous amount of basic scientific, genetic, and clinical research substantiated the role of lipoprotein-derived cholesterol in atherogenesis. Quantifying the impact of lipid lowering on cardiovascular event rates became an issue of utmost urgency. Although a variety of nonstatin drugs had been tested in clinical trials, they found limited utility in the clinical setting due to lack of mortality reduction or tolerability issues. As multiple prospective randomized statin trials began publishing their results, it became clear that reducing atherogenic lipoprotein burden with these drugs was highly efficacious, safe, and generally well tolerated. Statins have been shown to reduce risk for nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, need for revascularization, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. They have also been shown to stabilize and even regress established atherosclerotic plaque. For the first 2 decades of their use, statin dosing was largely determined by risk-stratified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. More recently, there has been a transition away from LDL-C goal attainment with a focus more on cardiovascular risk and percent LDL-C reduction. Unfortunately, long-term adherence rates with statin therapy remain low and, even when used, they tend to be underdosed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLDrug Dosage CalculationsDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseatherosclerosiscardiovascular eventslovastatinlow-density lipoprotein cholesterolmevastatin

Identifiers

PMID31049146
PMCPMC6489607
OpenAlexW2952450023

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.