Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048933›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?

Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo, Nicolas Sironi, Olivier Glaizot, Romain Pigeault, Philippe Christe

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Male-Biased Parasitism of Brandt's Voles (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Simultaneous Infection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Surveillance data for human leishmaniasis indicate the need for a sustainable action plan for its management and control, Greece, 2004 to 2018.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
  10. Sex-biased polyparasitism in moose (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Camille-Sophie CozzaroloDépartement d'Ecologie & Evolution, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-8622
Nicolas SironiDépartement d'Ecologie & Evolution, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.
Olivier GlaizotDépartement d'Ecologie & Evolution, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.
Romain PigeaultDépartement d'Ecologie & Evolution, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.
Philippe ChristeDépartement d'Ecologie & Evolution, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.
Ecologie & Evolution · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immunity and differential exposure to parasites. Exposure is mostly a consequence of host behavioural traits, but vector-borne parasitic infections involve another degree of complexity due to the active role of vectors in transmission. Blood-sucking insects may make choices based on cues produced by hosts. Regarding malaria, several studies highlighted a male-biased infection by Plasmodium sp in great tits (Parus major). We hypothesize that the mosquito vector, Culex pipiens, might at least partially cause this bias by being more attracted to male birds. Intrinsic variation associated to bird sex would explain a preference of mosquitoes for males. To test this hypothesis, we provide uninfected mosquitoes with a choice between uninfected male and female nestlings. Mosquito choice is assessed by sex typing of the ingested blood. We did not observe any preference for a given sex. This result does not support our prediction of a preference of mosquitoes for male great tits during the nestling period. In conclusion, mosquitoes do not seem to have an intrinsic preference for male nestlings. However, sexually divergent traits (e.g. behaviour, odour, metabolic rate) present in adults may play a role in the attraction of mosquitoes and should be investigated.

Indexed as

Bird DiseasesMalariaPasseriformesSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCulexFemaleMaleMosquito VectorsNesting BehaviorPlasmodium

Identifiers

PMID31048933
PMCPMC6497283
OpenAlexW2942801789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.