Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048866›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Empirical models for anatomical and physiological changes in a human mother and fetus during pregnancy and gestation.

Dustin F Kapraun, John F Wambaugh, R Woodrow Setzer, Richard S Judson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Echoes of Pregnancy: Maternal Perception of Phantom Fetal Movements After Childbirth.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The LEAP Process: Streamlining the Development of Long-Acting Products and Formulations for Infectious Diseases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of a rapid, generic human gestational dose model.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dustin F KapraunNational Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5570-6383
John F WambaughNational Center for Computational Toxicology, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4024-534X
R Woodrow SetzerNational Center for Computational Toxicology, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6709-9186
Richard S JudsonNational Center for Computational Toxicology, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-9633
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many parameters treated as constants in traditional physiologically based pharmacokinetic models must be formulated as time-varying quantities when modeling pregnancy and gestation due to the dramatic physiological and anatomical changes that occur during this period. While several collections of empirical models for such parameters have been published, each has shortcomings. We sought to create a repository of empirical models for tissue volumes, blood flow rates, and other quantities that undergo substantial changes in a human mother and her fetus during the time between conception and birth, and to address deficiencies with similar, previously published repositories. We used maximum likelihood estimation to calibrate various models for the time-varying quantities of interest, and then used the Akaike information criterion to select an optimal model for each quantity. For quantities of interest for which time-course data were not available, we constructed composite models using percentages and/or models describing related quantities. In this way, we developed a comprehensive collection of formulae describing parameters essential for constructing a PBPK model of a human mother and her fetus throughout the approximately 40 weeks of pregnancy and gestation. We included models describing blood flow rates through various fetal blood routes that have no counterparts in adults. Our repository of mathematical models for anatomical and physiological quantities of interest provides a basis for PBPK models of human pregnancy and gestation, and as such, it can ultimately be used to support decision-making with respect to optimal pharmacological dosing and risk assessment for pregnant women and their developing fetuses. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicModels, BiologicalMothersBlood CirculationFemaleFetusHematocritHumansPregnancyTissue Distribution

Identifiers

PMID31048866
PMCPMC6497258
OpenAlexW2949520834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.