Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048843›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous Australian patients at entry to specialist palliative care: Cross-sectional findings from a multi-jurisdictional dataset.

John A Woods, Jade C Newton, Sandra C Thompson, Eva Malacova, Hanh T Ngo, Judith M Katzenellenbogen, Kevin Murray, Shaouli Shahid, Claire E Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. End-of-life care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer: an exploratory study of service utilisation and unmet supportive care needs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John A WoodsWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3006-8500
Jade C NewtonCancer and Palliative Care Research and Evaluation Unit, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Sandra C ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Eva MalacovaSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Hanh T NgoRural Clinical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Judith M KatzenellenbogenSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Kevin MurraySchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Shaouli ShahidCentre for Aboriginal Studies, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Claire E JohnsonCancer and Palliative Care Research and Evaluation Unit, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-8441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few quantitative studies on palliative care provision to Indigenous Australians, a population known to experience distinctive barriers to quality healthcare and to have poorer health outcomes than other Australians.

objectivesTo investigate equity of specialist palliative care service provision through characterising and comparing Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients at entry to care.

methodsUsing data (01/01/2010-30/06/2015) from all services participating in the multi-jurisdictional Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients entering palliative care were compared on proportions vis-à-vis those expected from national statutory datasets, demographic characteristics, and entry-to-care status across fourteen 'problem' domains (e.g., pain, functional impairment) after matching by age, sex, and specific diagnosis.

resultsOf 140,267 patients, 1,465 (1.0%, much lower than expected from statutory data) were Indigenous, 133,987 (95.5%) non-Indigenous, and 4,905 (3.5%) had a missing identifier. The proportion of patients with a missing identifier diminished markedly over the study period, without a corresponding increase in the proportion identified as Indigenous. Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients were younger (mean 62.8 versus 73.0 years, p<0.001), a higher proportion were female (51.5% versus 46.3%; p<0.001) or resided outside major cities (44.2% versus 21.5%, p<0.001). Across all domains, Indigenous compared with matched non-Indigenous patients had lower or equal risk of status requiring prompt intervention.

conclusionsIndigenous patients (especially those residing outside major cities) are substantially under-represented in care by services participating in the nationwide specialist palliative care Collaboration, likely reflecting widespread access barriers. However, the similarity of status indicators among Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients at entry to care suggests that Indigenous patients who are able to access these services do not disproportionately experience clinically important impediments to care initiation.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareRiskRural PopulationSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID31048843
PMCPMC6497232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.