ArticlePloS one2019
Thermodynamic investigation of DNA-binding affinity of wild-type and mutant transcription factor RUNX1.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription factor RUNX1 and its binding partner CBFβ play a critical role in gene regulation for hematopoiesis. Mutations of RUNX1 cause ~10% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a particularly poor prognosis. The current paradigm for the leukemogenesis is that insufficient activity of wild-type (WT) RUNX1 impairs hematopoietic differentiation. The majority of mutant RUNX1 proteins lose the DNA-binding affinity and inhibit WT RUNX1 by depletion of CBFβ. Here, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to quantitatively study the interactions of WT and three clinical mutant RUNX1, CBFβ and DNA. Our data show that the binding of RUNX1 to DNA is enthalpy-driven, and the affinity decreases in the order of WT > S114L > R139Q >> K83E, which support previous observations and conclusion. To find potentially beneficial RUNX1 mutations that could increase the overall RUNX1 activity, K83R and H179K mutations of RUNX1 were designed, using structure-based computational modeling, and found to possess significantly higher DNA-binding affinities than does WT RUNX1. K83R and H179K mutant RUNX1 could therefore be protein-based RUNX1 activators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.