Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048838›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Risk factors associated with the occurrence of anthrax outbreaks in livestock in the country of Georgia: A case-control investigation 2013-2015.

Sangeeta Rao, Rita Traxler, Tsira Napetavaridze, Zviad Asanishvili, Ketevan Rukhadze, Giorgi Maghlakelidze, Marika Geleishvili, Mariam Broladze, Maka Kokhreidze, Debby Reynolds and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Landscape of Anthrax Prevention and Control: Stakeholders' Perceptive in Odisha, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sangeeta RaoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9234-0082
Rita TraxlerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-4116
Tsira NapetavaridzeNational Food Agency (NFA) of Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia (MEPA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Zviad AsanishviliNational Food Agency (NFA) of Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia (MEPA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ketevan RukhadzeDepartment of Rural Development and Vocational Education (DRDVE) of Georgian Institute of Public Affairs (GIPA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Giorgi MaghlakelidzeNational Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Marika GeleishviliNational Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Mariam BroladzeNational Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Maka KokhreidzeLaboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture (LMA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Debby ReynoldsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Sean ShadomyCDC One Health Office, NCEZID, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Mo SalmanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Colorado State University · USNational Center for Disease Control and Public Health · GENational Environmental Agency · GECenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USGeorgian Institute of Public Affairs · GENational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnthrax is considered endemic in livestock in Georgia. In 2007, the annual vaccination became the responsibility of livestock owners, while contracting of private veterinarians was not officially required. Six years later, due to increase in human outbreaks associated with livestock handling, there is a need to find out the risk factors of livestock anthrax in Georgia.

objectiveTo identify exposures and risk factors associated with livestock anthrax.

methodsA matched case-control study design was used to recruit the owners of individual livestock anthrax cases that occurred between June 2013 and May 2015, and owners of unaffected livestock from within ("village control") and outside the village ("area control"). We collected data about the case and control livestock animals' exposure and risk factors within the one-month prior to the disease onset of the case livestock (or matched case for the controls). We used logistic regression analysis (univariate and multivariable) to calculate the odds ratios of exposures and risk factors.

resultsDuring the study period, 36 anthrax cases met the case definition and were enrolled in the study; 67 matched village control livestock and 71 matched area control livestock were also enrolled. The findings from multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrate that vaccination within the last two years significantly reduced the odds of anthrax in cattle (OR = 0.014; 95% Confidence interval = <0.001, 0.99). The other factors that were significantly protective against anthrax were 'animals being in covered fence area/barn' (OR = 0.065; p-value = 0.036), and 'female animal being pregnant or milking compared to heifer' (OR = 0.006; p-value = 0.037).

conclusionsThe information obtained from this study has involved and been presented to decision makers, used to build technical capacity of veterinary staff, and to foster a One Health approach to the control of zoonotic diseases which will optimize prevention and control strategies. Georgia has embedded the knowledge and specific evidence that vaccination is a highly protective measure to prevent anthrax deaths among livestock, to which primary emphasis of the anthrax control program will be given. Education of livestock keepers in Georgia is an overriding priority.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAnimalsAnthraxCase-Control StudiesCattleFemaleGeorgia (Republic)GoatsHumansLivestockLogistic ModelsMaleRisk FactorsSheepZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID31048838
PMCPMC6497231
OpenAlexW2943122332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.