Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048778›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Acute respiratory responses to the use of e-cigarette: an intervention study.

Grzegorz M Brożek, Mateusz Jankowski, Jan E Zejda

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Knowledge and Beliefs of E-Cigarettes Among Physicians in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  18. E-Cigarettes are More Addictive than Traditional Cigarettes-A Study in Highly Educated Young People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grzegorz M BrożekDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Medykow 18 Str, 40-752, Katowice, Poland. gbrozek@sum.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-6471
Mateusz JankowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Medykow 18 Str, 40-752, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-5167
Jan E ZejdaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Medykow 18 Str, 40-752, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1619-3463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of our study was to assess acute respiratory responses to using e-cigarettes in exclusive e-cigarette users (E-Group) and dual users (T/E-Group) and to compare these effects with responses to smoking tobacco-cigarettes in tobacco smokers (T-Group). The study included 120 adults (age: 21.7 ± 2.1 years) divided into 4 groups (n = 30 each): Controls, T-, E-, T/E-Group. Spirometric status, O

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdultAnalysis of VarianceBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideCross-Sectional StudiesExhalationFemaleHumansLungMaleMultivariate AnalysisNitric OxideOxygenRespiratory Distress SyndromeSpirometryCarbon MonoxideNitric OxideOxygen

Identifiers

PMID31048778
PMCPMC6497705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.