Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048736›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparing ant behaviour indices for fine-scale analyses.

Patrick Krapf, Nadine Hochenegger, Wolfgang Arthofer, Birgit C Schlick-Steiner, Florian M Steiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick KrapfMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria. krapfpatrick@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-4473
Nadine HocheneggerMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
Wolfgang ArthoferMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
Birgit C Schlick-SteinerMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
Florian M SteinerMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal behaviour often is characterised by standardised assays. In social insects such as ants, behaviour assays are for example used to characterise aggressive and peaceful behaviour. Such assays differ in the number of individuals, the duration and place of assays, and the scoring scales. Also the behaviour indices used to summarise the results differ. Here, we compared five behaviour indices (Aggression Index, Mean Maximum Aggression Index; and the newly introduced Mean Maximum Peace Index, Mean Behaviour Index aggressive, and Mean Behaviour Index peaceful) using a scoring scale that comprises peaceful and aggressive behaviour. The indices were applied on eight simulations and three observed data sets. The five indices were correlated but frequently differed in their means. Multiple indices were needed to capture the complete behaviour range. Furthermore, subtle differences in workers' behaviour, that is, differences that go beyond the presence/absence of aggression, were only identified when considering multiple indices. We infer that the indices applied are differently suited for different analyses. Fine-scale analyses of behavioural variation profit from using more than one index. The particular choice of index or indices likely influences the interpretation of behaviour and should be carefully done in the light of study species and research question.

Indexed as

AggressionAnimalsAntsBehavior, AnimalSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID31048736
PMCPMC6497665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.