Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048664›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2020

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Toxicities.

Nai-Bin Chen, Bo Qiu, Jun Zhang, Meng-Yun Qiang, Yu-Jia Zhu, Bin Wang, Jin-Yu Guo, Ling-Zhi Cai, Shao-Min Huang, Meng-Zhong Liu and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Definitive chemo-radiotherapy in cervical oesophageal cancer: a comprehensive review of literature.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nai-Bin ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bo QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Meng-Yun QiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yu-Jia ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jin-Yu GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ling-Zhi CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Shao-Min HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Meng-Zhong LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Qun LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yong-Hong HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Qi-Wen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Science and Technology Program M201505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the survival and toxicities in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) treated by concurrent chemoradiothrapy with either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 112 consecutive CESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. 3D-CRT and IMRT groups had been analyzed by propensity score matching method, with sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, induction chemotherapy, and tumor stage well matched. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicities were compared between two groups by Fisher exact test.

resultsWith a median follow-up time of 34.9 months, the 3-year OS (p=0.927) and PFS (p=0.859) rate was 49.6% and 45.8% in 3D-CRT group, compared with 54.4% and 42.8% in IMRT group. The rates of grade ≥ 3 esophagitis, grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, esophageal stricture, and hemorrhage were comparable between two groups, while the rate of tracheostomy dependence was much higher in IMRT group than 3D-CRT group (14.3% vs.1.8%, p=0.032). Radiotherapy technique (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.79) and pretreatment hoarseness (HR, 0.12; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.70) were independently prognostic of tracheostomy dependence.

conclusionNo survival benefits had been observed while comparing IMRT versus 3D-CRT in CESCC patients. IMRT with fraction dose escalation and pretreatment hoarseness were considered to be associated with a higher risk for tracheostomy dependence. Radiation dose escalation beyond 60 Gy should be taken into account carefully when using IMRT with hypofractionated regimen.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageSurvival AnalysisCervical esophageal squamous cell carcinomaConformal radiotherapyIntensity-modulated radiotherapySurvivalTracheostomy dependence

Identifiers

PMID31048664
PMCPMC6962472
OpenAlexW2942926232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.