Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048129›Full record

Trial reportComputers in biology and medicine2019

Deep learning for identifying radiogenomic associations in breast cancer.

Zhe Zhu, Ehab Albadawy, Ashirbani Saha, Jun Zhang, Michael R Harowicz, Maciej A Mazurowski

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Computers in biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functions and mechanisms of RNA mInternational journal of oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhe ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, USA. Electronic address: zhe.zhu@duke.edu.
Ehab AlbadawyDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, USA. Electronic address: ehalbadawy93@gmail.com.
Ashirbani SahaDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, USA. Electronic address: as698@duke.edu.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, USA. Electronic address: xdzhangjun@gmail.com.
Michael R HarowiczDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, USA. Electronic address: michael.harowicz@gmail.com.
Maciej A MazurowskiDepartment of Radiology and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, USA. Electronic address: maciej.mazurowski@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Machine learning and collaborative filtering tools for personalized education in digital breast tomosynthesisR01EB021360 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAZUROWSKI, MACIEJ A. · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesTo determine whether deep learning models can distinguish between breast cancer molecular subtypes based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this institutional review board-approved single-center study, we analyzed DCE-MR images of 270 patients at our institution. Lesions of interest were identified by radiologists. The task was to automatically determine whether the tumor is of the Luminal A subtype or of another subtype based on the MR image patches representing the tumor. Three different deep learning approaches were used to classify the tumor according to their molecular subtypes: learning from scratch where only tumor patches were used for training, transfer learning where networks pre-trained on natural images were fine-tuned using tumor patches, and off-the-shelf deep features where the features extracted by neural networks trained on natural images were used for classification with a support vector machine. Network architectures utilized in our experiments were GoogleNet, VGG, and CIFAR. We used 10-fold crossvalidation method for validation and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) as the measure of performance.

resultsThe best AUC performance for distinguishing molecular subtypes was 0.65 (95% CI:[0.57,0.71]) and was achieved by the off-the-shelf deep features approach. The highest AUC performance for training from scratch was 0.58 (95% CI:[0.51,0.64]) and the best AUC performance for transfer learning was 0.60 (95% CI:[0.52,0.65]) respectively. For the off-the-shelf approach, the features extracted from the fully connected layer performed the best.

conclusionDeep learning may play a role in discovering radiogenomic associations in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBreast cancer subtypeDeep learningRadiogenomic

Identifiers

PMID31048129
PMCPMC7155381
OpenAlexW2964166134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.