Trial reportComputers in biology and medicine2019
Deep learning for identifying radiogenomic associations in breast cancer.
Trial report in Computers in biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive assessment of breast cancer molecular subtypes on multiparametric MRI using convolutional neural network with transfer learning.Thoracic cancer · 2022Trial
- AI-MIRACLE: Artificial Intelligence and MultIpaRAmetric MRI Predict CLinical OutcomEs to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.European urology oncology · 2026Article
- AI-powered radiogenomics: imaging-driven diagnosis and discovery of cancer's molecular and cellular landscape.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Review
- A Multiphase CT-Based Integrated Deep Learning Framework for Rectal Cancer Detection, Segmentation, and Staging: Performance Comparison with Radiologist Assessment.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-BLADE toolbox: AI-powered BLADdEr multiparametric MRI analysis for clinical application.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- A robust deep learning framework for RNA 5-methyluridine modification prediction using integrated features.BMC biology · 2025Article
- High-Performance Open-Source AI for Breast Cancer Detection and Localization in MRI.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- ChatGPT-4-Driven Liver Ultrasound Radiomics Analysis: Diagnostic Value and Drawbacks in a Comparative Study.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- N6-methyladenine identification using deep learning and discriminative feature integration.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Deep-ProBind: binding protein prediction with transformer-based deep learning model.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Transparency and Representation in Clinical Research Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Radiogenomic Landscape of Metastatic Endocrine-Positive Breast Cancer Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitors.Cancers · 2025Review
- Deep Radiogenomics Sequencing for Breast Tumor Gene-Phenotype Decoding Using Dynamic Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Deep-m5U: a deep learning-based approach for RNA 5-methyluridine modification prediction using optimized feature integration.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Olecranon bone age assessment in puberty using a lateral elbow radiograph and a deep-learning model.European radiology · 2024Article
- Functions and mechanisms of RNA mInternational journal of oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Sequence based model using deep neural network and hybrid features for identification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine modification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in breast surgery: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- The Convergence of Radiology and Genomics: Advancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis with Radiogenomics.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesTo determine whether deep learning models can distinguish between breast cancer molecular subtypes based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this institutional review board-approved single-center study, we analyzed DCE-MR images of 270 patients at our institution. Lesions of interest were identified by radiologists. The task was to automatically determine whether the tumor is of the Luminal A subtype or of another subtype based on the MR image patches representing the tumor. Three different deep learning approaches were used to classify the tumor according to their molecular subtypes: learning from scratch where only tumor patches were used for training, transfer learning where networks pre-trained on natural images were fine-tuned using tumor patches, and off-the-shelf deep features where the features extracted by neural networks trained on natural images were used for classification with a support vector machine. Network architectures utilized in our experiments were GoogleNet, VGG, and CIFAR. We used 10-fold crossvalidation method for validation and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) as the measure of performance.
resultsThe best AUC performance for distinguishing molecular subtypes was 0.65 (95% CI:[0.57,0.71]) and was achieved by the off-the-shelf deep features approach. The highest AUC performance for training from scratch was 0.58 (95% CI:[0.51,0.64]) and the best AUC performance for transfer learning was 0.60 (95% CI:[0.52,0.65]) respectively. For the off-the-shelf approach, the features extracted from the fully connected layer performed the best.
conclusionDeep learning may play a role in discovering radiogenomic associations in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.