Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046808›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Distant metastasis dynamics following subsequent surgeries after primary breast cancer removal.

Romano Demicheli, Hanna Dillekås, Oddbjørn Straume, Elia Biganzoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Tumor Dormancy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Romano DemicheliLaboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Campus Cascina Rosa, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Vanzetti 5, 20133, Milan, Italy. demicheliromano@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1343-6431
Hanna DillekåsDepartment of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, N 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Oddbjørn StraumeDepartment of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, N 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Elia BiganzoliLaboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Campus Cascina Rosa, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Vanzetti 5, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the research was to separate the distant metastasis (DM) enhancing effect due to breast tumour removal from that due to surgical manoeuvre by itself.

methodsDM dynamics following surgery for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and delayed reconstruction (REC), which was performed after the original breast cancer surgical removal, was analysed. A total of 338 patients with IBTR, 239 with CBC and 312 with REC were studied.

resultsThe DM dynamics following IBTR, CBC and REC, when assessed with time origin at their surgical treatment, is similar to the analogous pattern following primary tumour removal, with a first major peak at about 18 months and a second lower one at about 5 years from surgery. The time span between primary tumour removal and the second surgery is influential on DM risk levels for IBTR and CBC patients, not for REC patients.

conclusionsThe role of breast tumour removal is different from the role of surgery by itself. Our findings suggest that the major effect of reconstructive surgery is microscopic metastasis acceleration, while breast tumour surgical removal (either primary or IBTR or CBC) involves both tumour homeostasis interruption and microscopic metastasis growth acceleration. The removal of a breast tumour would eliminate its homeostatic restrains on metastatic foci, thus allowing metastasis development, which, in turn, would be supported by the forwarding action of the mechanisms triggered by the surgical wounding.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPostoperative PeriodTumor BurdenYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerMetastasis developmentRecurrence dynamicsSecond surgerySurgery-related metastasis accelerationTumour homeostasis

Identifiers

PMID31046808
PMCPMC6498656
OpenAlexW2943865741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.