Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046757›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2019

Outcomes of three different ways to train medical students as ultrasound tutors.

Nora Celebi, Jan Griewatz, Nisar Peter Malek, Tatjana Hoffmann, Carina Walter, Reinhold Muller, Reimer Riessen, Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich, Ines Debove, Stephan Zipfel and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trends Versus Transformative Tools Within Anatomy Education: The Case for Ultrasound.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nora CelebiPHV dialysis center Waiblingen, Beinsteiner Straße 8/3, 71334, Waiblingen, Germany.
Jan GriewatzCompetence Centre for University Teaching in Medicine, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Str. 10, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nisar Peter MalekDepartment of Internal Medicine I (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases), University Hospital Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Tatjana HoffmannDepartment of Internal Medicine I (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases), University Hospital Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Carina WalterEberhard-Karls University, Geissweg 5/3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Reinhold MullerJames Cook University, 1/14-88 McGregor Rd, Smithfield, QLD, 4878, Australia.
Reimer RiessenDepartment of Internal Medicine VIII (Intensive Care Unit), University Hospital Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Jan Pauluschke-FröhlichDepartment of Womens Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Ines DeboveDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, CH, Switzerland.
Stephan ZipfelDepartment of Internal Medicine VI (Psychosomatic Medicine), University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Eckhart FröhlichDepartment of Internal Medicine I (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases), University Hospital Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Eckhart.Froehlich@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-258X

Funding

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen F.7281048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to provide faculty-wide undergraduate ultrasound training in times of scarce resources, many medical faculties employ trained peer-student tutors to oversee the hands-on training. However, data to guide the training of ultrasound peer-student tutors are scarce. We conducted a prospective quasi-randomized study to assess the gain in theoretical knowledge and practical scanning skills of peer-student tutors who were trained with a course only, an internship only, or the combination of a course and an internship.

methodsA total of 44 peer-student tutors were trained by a one-week course only (C-Group, n = 21), by an internship only (I-Group, n = 10) or by a course and an internship (CI-Group, n = 13). Prior to and after the completion of the training the peer-student tutors completed an MC-test (theoretical knowledge) and an OSCE (practical scanning skills).

resultsWith all three education concepts, the peer-student tutors had significant and comparable gains in theoretical knowledge (C-group + 90%, I-group + 61.5%, CI-group + 114.0%) and practical scanning skills (C-group + 112.0%, I-group + 155.0% and CI-group + 123.5%), all p < 0.001.

conclusionPeer-student tutors, who were trained with a course or an internship or a course and internship improved their theoretical knowledge and their practical scanning skills significantly and to a comparable degree.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalUltrasonographyAdultClinical CompetenceDiffusion of InnovationEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyMaleModels, EducationalPeer GroupProspective StudiesCourseInternshipStudent instructor educationUltrasound educationUltrasound tutor skill acquisitionUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID31046757
PMCPMC6498570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.