ArticleBMC public health2019
Employment conditions and use of gastric cancer screening services in Korea: a nationwide survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Socioeconomic factors affecting breast and cervical cancer screening compliance in Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance countries: a systematic review.Epidemiology and health · 2025Pooled it
- The Barriers and Facilitators of Gastric Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Absolute and relative socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation among adults aged 40-74 years in South Korea: a repeated cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Congenital Heart Defect Screening Among Children with Down Syndrome in Rwanda: A Cross-Sectional Study.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2026Article
- The impact of working conditions on breast cancer outcomes: a study protocol for a population-based cohort study using UK Biobank data.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Long-term adherence to gastric cancer screening in South Korea: A 10-year follow-up study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Strategies for Improving the Utilization of Preventive Care Services: Application of Importance-Performance Gap Analysis Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Role of Occupation in Shaping Cancer Disparities.Cancers · 2022Review
- Global burden of major gastrointestinal cancers and its association with socioeconomics, 1990-2019.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Relationship of attitudes toward uncertainty and preventive health behaviors with breast cancer screening participation.BMC women's health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough it is well known that employment conditions exert considerable effects on health and health equity, the association between employment conditions and the use of preventative health services has rarely been studied. We explored whether inequities in the use of preventative services were associated with employment conditions. We used gastric cancer screening as a surrogate for the use of preventative health services.
methodsThe study population was derived from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey IV (2007-2009), which included data on 5626 individuals over 40 years of age. Employment conditions were grouped by employment status, work hours, employment contract term, and salary source. Participants who had undergone gastroscopy or an upper gastrointestinal series within the past 2 years were considered to have used cancer screening services according to the National Cancer Screening Program guidelines. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multiple logistic regression analysis. As the survey procedure incorporated sample weights, we adjusted our calculations to consider the complex sample design.
resultsSelf-employed workers were less likely to participate in regular cancer screening than were wage workers (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68-0.92), and part-time workers were less likely to participate than were full-time workers (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.99). Among wage workers, temporary workers and daily workers exhibited lower participation rates than did regular workers (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.63-1.05 and OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.44-0.76, respectively). Dispatched workers also exhibited lower participation rates (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.25-0.80).
conclusionsWe found obvious inequities in the use of preventative health services associated with various employment conditions. Self-employed, irregular, and dispatched workers were significantly less likely to participate in cancer screening than were other workers. Political efforts should be made to reduce employment insecurity and to improve participation in preventative screening services by vulnerable employees so as to resolve the evident health inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.