Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046721›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Study protocol of the X:IT II - a school-based smoking preventive intervention.

Lotus Sofie Bast, Pernille Due, Stine Glenstrup Lauemøller, Niels Them Kjær, Tenna Christiansen, Anette Andersen

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Places to Smoke: Exploring Smoking-Related Practices among Danish Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lotus Sofie BastNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestreade 6, 1455, Copenhagen, Denmark. loni@niph.dk.
Pernille DueNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestreade 6, 1455, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stine Glenstrup LauemøllerNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestreade 6, 1455, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels Them KjærDanish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tenna ChristiansenDanish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anette AndersenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestreade 6, 1455, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe X:IT intervention, conducted in 2010 to 2013, showed overall smoking preventive effect. However, parts of the intervention appeared less appealing to children from families with lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Therefore, the intervention components were modified and an evaluation of the amended intervention X:IT II is needed to show the effect of this revised intervention and whether children from different social backgrounds benefits equally from the current intervention.

methodsMain intervention components are smoke free schools, a curricular component, and parental involvement (smoke free agreements and talks about tobacco). Components have been revised from the first version; 1) previously, schools should be smoke free on the school ground and were encouraged to hide smoking so that it wasn't visible to pupils from the school ground. Now they are encouraged to tighten the rules so that no pupils or teachers smoke during the school day, no matter where they are; 2) the specifically developed educational material (Up in Smoke) has been revised so that all materials are online and all texts has a ARI; 3) the parental involvement is now targeted multiple groups of parents, e.g. parents that are smokers, and parents of children that smoke. Language used is simpler and the website for parents presents very specific examples. X:IT is implemented in 46 Danish public schools from fall 2017 until summer 2020. Data is collected through electronic questionnaires to students and coordinators four times (fall 2017, spring/summer 2018, 2019 and 2020). Further, qualitative interviews and observations are conducted. DISCUSSION: Prevalence of smoking among Danish adolescents is high compared to other Nordic countries and there is social inequality in smoking, leaving individuals from the lowest social backgrounds at higher risk. Although there has been an overall decline in smoking among Danish adolescents over the last decades, a recent levelling of this development indicates an urgent need for smoking prevention in Denmark. The X:IT intervention has the potential to prevent uptake of smoking among adolescents. However, there is a particular need for evaluating the effectiveness of the revised X:IT intervention, X:IT II, with focus on the effect across socioeconomic groups of adolescents.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN31292019 , date of registration 24/10/2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionAdolescentClinical Studies as TopicDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceResearch DesignScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSchoolsSocial NormsStudentsAdolescentsDifferential effectSchool interventionSmoking preventionSocioeconomic groupsTobacco prevention

Identifiers

PMID31046721
PMCPMC6498574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.