Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046693›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2019

Trained volunteers to support chronically ill, multimorbid elderly between hospital and domesticity - a systematic review of one-on-one-intervention types, effects, and underlying training concepts.

Anne Goehner, Cornelia Kricheldorff, Eva Maria Bitzer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05264207 (Nursing Students' Visits to Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05264207 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Nursing Students' Visits to Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Effects on Self-care and Other Related Variables (VISITAME)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled252ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsNursing students' home-visit programme, Standard care from Public Andalusian Health Service
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne GoehnerCenter for Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Freiburg, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Lehener Str. 88, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. anne.goehner@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-4699
Cornelia KricheldorffCatholic University of Applied Sciences Freiburg, Karlstr. 63, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Eva Maria BitzerUniversity of Education Freiburg, Public Health & Health Education, Kunzenweg 21, 79117, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew approaches are needed to address the challenges of demographic change, staff shortages, and societal change in the care of the elderly. While volunteering has barely been established as a pillar of the welfare state in several countries, legislators and nonprofit or community-based organizations in some countries favor the increased integration of volunteers, as they can rely on many dedicated people. When caring for the multimorbid elderly, the transition from hospital to domesticity involves certain risks. Currently, no systematic knowledge exists on whether and how elderly benefit from volunteer support after a hospital stay. Objectives of this systematic review were to (1) identify evaluated approaches with trained volunteers supporting chronically ill, multimorbid elderly one-on-one at the interface between hospital and domesticity; (2) investigate the patient-related effectiveness of the approaches; (3) present the characteristics of the supporting volunteers; and (4) present the underlying teaching and training concepts for the volunteers.

methodsA systematic search of the following online databases was conducted in April 2017: the Cochrane Library, Medline (PubMed), CINAHL, and PsycINFO (Ebscohost). We included (cluster/quasi-) randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and single-group pre-post design. An institutional search was conducted on eight national institutions from research and practice in Germany. Screening was conducted by one researcher, risk of bias was assessed. Study authors were contacted for study and training details.

resultsWe identified a total of twelve studies, eight of which evaluated treatment following hospital stay: psychosocial-coordinative support (n = 2), physical-cognitive activation (n = 4), and assistance with medication intake (n = 2). We saw short-term effects with small and medium effect sizes. Most volunteers were women aged between 45 and 61 years. Their training lasted 12-26 h and took place prior to first patient contact. During the intervention, volunteers could rely on permanent supporting structures.

conclusionsFew studies exist that have evaluated one-on-one-volunteer support following hospitalization, and the effects are inconsistent. As such, further, well-designed studies are needed. The suitability and transferability of the interventions in country-specific settings should be examined in feasibility studies. Furthermore, an international discussion on the appropriate theoretical backgrounds of volunteer training is needed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleGermanyHome Care ServicesHospitalizationHumansMaleMultimorbidityPatient TransferRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVolunteersAccompanimentAftercareAgedChronic diseaseFrailtyHospitalsLay helperSupportTrainingVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID31046693
PMCPMC6498473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.