Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046679›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Expanding the biodiversity of Oenococcus oeni through comparative genomics of apple cider and kombucha strains.

Marc P Lorentzen, Hugo Campbell-Sills, Tue S Jorgensen, Tue K Nielsen, Monika Coton, Emmanuel Coton, Lars Hansen, Patrick M Lucas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of SpecificMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Comparative genomic analysis of 255Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A new cheese population inEvolutionary applications · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Analysis of an Excellent Wine-Making StrainPolish journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Analysis of Transcriptomic Response to SOMicrobiology spectrum · 2021
    Article
  9. Distribution of Prophages in theMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  10. Distribution of Oenococcus oeni populations in natural habitats.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marc P LorentzenUniversity of Bordeaux, ISVV, Unit Oenology, F-33882, Villenave d'Ornon, France. marcgall@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-1995
Hugo Campbell-SillsUniversity of Bordeaux, ISVV, Unit Oenology, F-33882, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Tue S JorgensenDepartment of Environmental Science, Environmental Microbial Genomics Group, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Tue K NielsenDepartment of Environmental Science, Environmental Microbial Genomics Group, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Monika CotonUniversité de Brest, Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Écologie Microbienne, EA 3882. ESIAB, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280, Plouzané, France.
Emmanuel CotonUniversité de Brest, Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Écologie Microbienne, EA 3882. ESIAB, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280, Plouzané, France.
Lars HansenDepartment of Environmental Science, Environmental Microbial Genomics Group, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Patrick M LucasUniversity of Bordeaux, ISVV, Unit Oenology, F-33882, Villenave d'Ornon, France.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, ITN MICROWINE 643063Villum Fonden (DK), Project AMPHICOP 8960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOenococcus oeni is a lactic acid bacteria species adapted to the low pH, ethanol-rich environments of wine and cider fermentation, where it performs the crucial role of malolactic fermentation. It has a small genome and has lost the mutS-mutL DNA mismatch repair genes, making it a hypermutable and highly specialized species. Two main lineages of strains, named groups A and B, have been described to date, as well as other subgroups correlated to different types of wines or regions. A third group "C" has also been hypothesized based on sequence analysis, but it remains controversial. In this study we have elucidated the species population structure by sequencing 14 genomes of new strains isolated from cider and kombucha and performing comparative genomics analyses.

resultsSequence-based phylogenetic trees confirmed a population structure of 4 clades: The previously identified A and B, a third group "C" consisting of the new cider strains and a small subgroup of wine strains previously attributed to group B, and a fourth group "D" exclusively represented by kombucha strains. A pair of complete genomes from group C and D were compared to the circularized O. oeni PSU-1 strain reference genome and no genomic rearrangements were found. Phylogenetic trees, K-means clustering and pangenome gene clusters evidenced the existence of smaller, specialized subgroups of strains. Using the pangenome, genomic differences in stress resistance and biosynthetic pathways were found to uniquely distinguish the C and D clades.

conclusionsThe obtained results, including the additional cider and kombucha strains, firmly established the O. oeni population structure. Group C does not appear as fully domesticated as group A to wine, but showed several unique patterns which may be due to ongoing specialization to the cider environment. Group D was shown to be the most divergent member of O. oeni to date, appearing as the closest to a pre-domestication state of the species.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenome, BacterialKombucha TeaWineMalusOenococcusPhylogenyWhole Genome SequencingKombucha TeaComparative genomicsIndustrial microbiologyLactic acid bacteriaOenococcus oeniPan-genomePhylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID31046679
PMCPMC6498615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.