Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046666›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Efficient proximal gradient algorithm for inference of differential gene networks.

Chen Wang, Feng Gao, Georgios B Giannakis, Gennaro D'Urso, Xiaodong Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, 33146, FL, USA.
Feng GaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, 33146, FL, USA.
Georgios B GiannakisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, MN, USA.
Gennaro D'UrsoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami, Miami, 33136, FL, USA.
Xiaodong CaiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, 33146, FL, USA. x.cai@miami.edu.

Funding

Sparse Structural Equation Models for Gene Networks and Chemical GenomicsR01GM104975 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI CAI, XIAODONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
National Institute of General Medical Sciences 5R01GM104975National Science Foundation (US) CC-1319981NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene networks in living cells can change depending on various conditions such as caused by different environments, tissue types, disease states, and development stages. Identifying the differential changes in gene networks is very important to understand molecular basis of various biological process. While existing algorithms can be used to infer two gene networks separately from gene expression data under two different conditions, and then to identify network changes, such an approach does not exploit the similarity between two gene networks, and it is thus suboptimal. A desirable approach would be clearly to infer two gene networks jointly, which can yield improved estimates of network changes.

resultsIn this paper, we developed a proximal gradient algorithm for differential network (ProGAdNet) inference, that jointly infers two gene networks under different conditions and then identifies changes in the network structure. Computer simulations demonstrated that our ProGAdNet outperformed existing algorithms in terms of inference accuracy, and was much faster than a similar approach for joint inference of gene networks. Gene expression data of breast tumors and normal tissues in the TCGA database were analyzed with our ProGAdNet, and revealed that 268 genes were involved in the changed network edges. Gene set enrichment analysis identified a significant number of gene sets related to breast cancer or other types of cancer that are enriched in this set of 268 genes. Network analysis of the kidney cancer data in the TCGA database with ProGAdNet also identified a set of genes involved in network changes, and the majority of the top genes identified have been reported in the literature to be implicated in kidney cancer. These results corroborated that the gene sets identified by ProGAdNet were very informative about the cancer disease status. A software package implementing the ProGAdNet, computer simulations, and real data analysis is available as Additional file 1.

conclusionWith its superior performance over existing algorithms, ProGAdNet provides a valuable tool for finding changes in gene networks, which may aid the discovery of gene-gene interactions changed under different conditions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKidney NeoplasmsDifferential networkGene networkProximal gradient method

Identifiers

PMID31046666
PMCPMC6498668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.