Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046576›Full record

SynthesisEpigenetics2019

Epigenetic changes in healthy human skeletal muscle following exercise- a systematic review.

Macsue Jacques, Danielle Hiam, Jeffrey Craig, Romain Barrès, Nir Eynon, Sarah Voisin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Omics Sciences in Regular Physical Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Macsue Jacquesa Institute for Health and Sport (iHeS) , Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4337-7022
Danielle Hiama Institute for Health and Sport (iHeS) , Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0135-329X
Jeffrey Craigb Centre for Molecular and Medical Research , Deakin University , Geelong , Victoria , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-7849
Romain Barrèsd Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Nir Eynona Institute for Health and Sport (iHeS) , Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4046-8276
Sarah Voisina Institute for Health and Sport (iHeS) , Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4074-7083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise training is continually challenging whole-body homeostasis, leading to improvements in performance and health. Adaptations to exercise training are complex and are influenced by both environmental and genetic factors. Epigenetic factors regulate gene expression in a tissue-specific manner and constitute a link between the genotype and the environment. Moreover, epigenetic factors are emerging as potential biomarkers that could predict the response to exercise training. This systematic review aimed to identify epigenetic changes that have been reported in skeletal muscle following exercise training in healthy populations. A literature search of five databases (PUBMED, MEDLINE, CINHAL, SCOPUS and SportDiscuss) was conducted in November 2018. Articles were included if they examined epigenetic modifications (DNA methylation, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs) in skeletal muscle, following either an acute bout of exercise, an exercise intervention in a pre/post design, or a case/control type of study. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Several epigenetic markers including DNA methylation of genes known to be differentially expressed after exercise and myomiRs were reported to be modified after exercise. Several epigenetic marks were identified to be altered in response to exercise, with potential influence on skeletal muscle metabolism. However, whether these epigenetic marks play a role in the physiological impact of exercise is unclear. Exercise epigenetics is still a very young research field, and it is expected that in the future the causality of such changes will be elucidated

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiomarkersDNA MethylationExerciseHistone CodeHumansMuscle, SkeletalRNA, UntranslatedBiomarkersRNA, UntranslatedDNA methylationhistone modificationsmiRNAsskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID31046576
PMCPMC6557592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.