Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046371›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Psychometric function slope for speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech: Effects of development and aging.

Kathryn A Sobon, Nardine M Taleb, Emily Buss, John H Grose, Lauren Calandruccio

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Aperiodic EEG Predicts Variability of Visual Temporal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  10. Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  14. Does visual speech provide release from perceptual masking in children?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn A SobonDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Nardine M TalebDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USAkathryn_sobon@med.unc.edu, nmt29@case.edu, ebuss@med.unc.edu, jhg@med.unc.edu, lauren.calandruccio@case.edu.
Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
John H GroseDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Lauren CalandruccioDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USAkathryn_sobon@med.unc.edu, nmt29@case.edu, ebuss@med.unc.edu, jhg@med.unc.edu, lauren.calandruccio@case.edu.

Funding

COMPLEX SOUND ANALYSIS IN NORMAL AND IMPAIRED LISTENERSR01DC001507 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GROSE, JOHN H · 1993 to 2017
$5.0M
Speech-on-speech masking and hearing impairment: Factors affecting variabilityR03DC015074 · NIDCD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CALANDRUCCIO, LAUREN · 2016 to 2018
$476k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001507NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC015074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Masked sentence recognition was evaluated in normal-hearing children (8.8-10.5 years), young adults (18-28 years), and older adults (60-71 years). Consistent with published data, speech recognition thresholds were poorer for young children and older adults than for young adults, particularly when the masker was composed of speech. Psychometric function slopes were steeper for young children and older adults than for young adults when the masker was two-talker speech, but not when it was speech-shaped noise. Multiple factors are implicated in the age effects observed for speech-in-speech recognition at low signal-to-noise ratios.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAgingAuditory ThresholdChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual MaskingPsychometricsSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID31046371
PMCPMC6910021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.