Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31046102›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2019

Performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review.

Alexis Jones, Timothy J P Bray, Peter Mandl, Margaret A Hall-Craggs, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Pedro M Machado

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexis JonesDepartment of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Timothy J P BrayCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Peter MandlDepartment of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Margaret A Hall-CraggsCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Helena Marzo-OrtegaNIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, London.
Pedro M MachadoDepartment of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthVersus Arthritis 21369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo summarize the evidence on the performance of MRI for the diagnosis of axial SpA.

methodsThis was a systematic literature review of all studies from January 2013 to March 2017 including adult patients with clinically suspected axial SpA undergoing MRI. Studies from a previously published systematic literature review up to January 2013 were also included.

resultsThirty-one studies were included. Six studies demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for SI joint (SIJ) bone marrow oedema (BMO). Specificity was increased by the presence of other structural lesions alongside BMO, particularly erosions or fat infiltration. Four studies addressed the utility of SIJ fat infiltration, finding good sensitivity but poor specificity. SIJ erosions showed good specificity in five studies. Studies addressing high T1 signal in the SIJ, fluid signal in the SIJ, ankylosis, sclerosis, capsulitis, backfill and vacuum phenomenon reported limited diagnostic value. In the spine, four studies reported moderate sensitivity and specificity for corner inflammatory lesions, and four reported poor sensitivity and specificity for spinal fat infiltration. Five studies evaluated the added value of spinal MRI over SIJ MRI alone, with variable results depending on the cohort. Six studies addressed the effect of acquisition parameters on diagnostic accuracy: fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) imaging showed comparable utility in identifying BMO. Three studies showed that gadolinium was of minimal added value in the detection of BMO.

conclusionsThese results confirmed the diagnostic utility of MRI in axial SpA. Performance varied according to the characteristics of the cohort and the number and combination of MRI lesions considered.

Indexed as

AdultBone MarrowEdemaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSacroiliac JointSensitivity and SpecificitySpineSpondylarthritisankylosing spondylitisdiagnosisdiagnostic performanceinflammationmagnetic resonance imagingsacroiliitisspondyloarthritis

Identifiers

PMID31046102
PMCPMC6812711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.