ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019
Efficacy of lung cancer screening appears to increase with prolonged intervention: results from the MILD trial and a meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Ten-year results of the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection trial demonstrate the safety and efficacy of biennial lung cancer screening.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2019Trial
- Next-generation proteomics improves lung cancer risk prediction.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Structured narrative review on lung cancer screening: current evidence, clinical practice implications and implementation insights from a multidisciplinary task force and patient representatives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Prediction of the stage shift growth of early-stage lung adenocarcinomas by volume-doubling time.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Lung cancer risk discrimination of prediagnostic proteomics measurements compared with existing prediction tools.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Expected Cost Savings From Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scan Screening for Lung Cancer in Alberta, Canada.JTO clinical and research reports · 2022Article
- Impact of Smoking Status on Lung Cancer Characteristics and Mortality Rates between Screened and Non-Screened Lung Cancer Cohorts: Real-World Knowledge Translation and Education.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Impact Analysis of miR-1253 on Lung Cancer Progression Through Targeted Regulation of ANXA3.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Focus on lung cancer screening.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening.European radiology · 2020Review
- Lung cancer screening: tell me more about post-test risk.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31046087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.