ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2019
Novel therapeutic strategies for renovascular disease.
Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: A KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Controversies Conference.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022Article
- Review
- Renal Artery Stenosis in the Patient with Hypertension: Prevalence, Impact and Management.Integrated blood pressure control · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewRenovascular disease (RVD) remains an important cause of hypertension and renal dysfunction. Given the failure of renal revascularization to provide consistent clinical benefit in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for Renal Artery Lesions trial among others, further research has underscored the need for mechanistically targeted interventions to improve renal outcomes in patients in RVD. This review discusses novel therapeutic approaches for RVD in the post-Cardiovascular Outcomes for Renal Artery Lesions era. RECENT
findingsEmerging evidence indicates that renal inflammation, microvascular remodeling, and mitochondrial damage accelerate progression of renal injury and are important determinants of the response to revascularization. Experimental studies have identified interventions capable of ameliorating renal inflammation (e.g., cytokine inhibitors, mesenchymal stem cells), microvascular remodeling (proangiogenic interventions), and mitochondrial injury (mito-protective drugs), alone or combined with renal revascularization, to preserve the structure and function of the poststenotic kidney. Recent prospective pilot studies in patients with atherosclerotic RVD demonstrate the safety and feasibility of some of such interventions to protect the kidney. SUMMARY: Experimental studies and pilot clinical trials suggest that therapies targeting renal inflammation, microvascular remodeling, and mitochondrial damage have the potential to preserve the structure and function of the stenotic kidney. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm their renoprotective effects and clinical role in human RVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.