ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019
Quantitative analysis of Gd in the protein content of the brain following single injection of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) by size exclusion chromatography.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Single Exposure to Gadoteric Acid in Healthy Rats-Gadolinium, Iron and Other Metal Accumulation in Kidney and Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Imaging of Transmetallation and Chelation Phenomena Involving Radiological Contrast Agents in Mineral-Rich Fruits.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Neutrophil elastase in the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF)-like skin lesion in renal failure mouse model.PloS one · 2021Article
- Retention of Gadolinium in Brain Parenchyma: Pathways for Speciation, Access, and Distribution. A Critical Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the role of transporter proteins in gadolinium (Gd) distribution and retention in the brain after one high-dose injection of Gd-based contrast agent (GBCA). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 30 ddY mice were randomly divided into three treatment groups to be intravenously injected with either Gadodiamide (linear GBCA), Gadobutrol (macrocyclic GBCA), or Gadoterate (macrocyclic GBCA) at a dose of 5 mmol/kg, while five mice in the control group received 250 µL saline. Five minutes (5 min) and ten days (10d) post-injection, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), choroid plexus (CP), and meninges and associated vasculature (MAV) were collected. The brain was then dissected to obtain the olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, and brainstem. Proteins were extracted and separated by a size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SEC) system, and Gd concentrations were quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
results5 m post-injection, the Gadodiamide group had the highest Gd concentration, while Gadoterate had the lowest Gd concentration in all parts of the brain (
conclusionGBCAs may be able to pass through intact brain barriers, and the chemical structures of GBCAs may affect the penetration capability of Gd into the brain. Retained Gd in the brain tissue from Gadodiamide and Gadobutrol may be bound to some organic molecules, including proteins. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Intact GBCA are able to penetrate a series of brain barrier immediately after administration regardless the type of the chelate. Gd may be bound with macromolecules that may cause Gd retention in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.