Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31045382›Full record

SynthesisHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2019

Multimorbidity in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions: A systematic review.

Carolyn R T Stoll, Sonya Izadi, Susan Fowler, Sydney Philpott-Streiff, Paige Green, Jerry Suls, Anke C Winter, Graham A Colditz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Multimorbidity: Implications and directions for health psychology and behavioral medicine.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolyn R T StollDivision of Public Health Sciences.
Sonya IzadiDivision of Public Health Sciences.
Susan FowlerBecker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine.
Sydney Philpott-StreiffDivision of Public Health Sciences.
Paige GreenBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute.
Jerry SulsBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute.
Anke C WinterDivision of Public Health Sciences.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-0291

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Targeting the Bone Marrow Microenvironment In Acute Lymphocytic LeukemiaP50CA171963 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel C Link · 2013 to 2026
$31.6M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P50 CA171963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs the population with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) increases, it is essential that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) consider MCC. Behavioral interventions have the potential to positively impact MCC patient outcomes; however, a comprehensive review of consideration of MCC in these trials has not been conducted. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the frequency with which participants with MCC are represented in behavioral intervention RCTs targeting chronic illness published 2000-2014.

methodMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 2000 to 2014 to identify RCTs testing behavioral interventions among adults with chronic illness. A random sampling selection process was performed to identify 600 eligible studies representative of the literature. Two reviewers independently extracted information on consideration of MCC in eligibility criteria and evaluated the reporting and consideration of MCC in trial analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool.

resultsIn 600 behavioral intervention RCTs, targeting MCC was rare (4.3%). Exclusion of MCC was common (68.3%) and was done through general, specific, or vague exclusion criteria. 218 (36.3%) trials reported presence of MCCs through general or condition-specific measures. Comorbidities were only considered in 4.8% of all trial analyses.

conclusionsIn this comprehensive systematic review of 600 studies published from 2000-2014, RCTs testing behavioral interventions rarely consider individuals with MCC, limiting generalizability. Given the public health relevance and limited evidence base, this work highlights the urgent need to improve the consideration of MCC in clinical trial research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Behavioral MedicineChronic DiseaseHumansMultimorbidityRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31045382
PMCPMC6983953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.