ArticleThe Journal of physiology2019
Non-invasive assessment of superficial and deep layer circuits in human motor cortex.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational investigation of circuit mechanisms underlying short-latency responses to cortical stimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Intracortical facilitation and inhibition in human primary motor cortex during motor skill acquisition.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- The recruitment of indirect waves within primary motor cortex during motor imagery: A directional transcranial magnetic stimulation study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Temporal Profile of Descending Cortical Modulation of Spinal Excitability: Group and Individual-Specific Effects.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Article
- Characterizing the effect of low intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation on the soleus H-reflex at rest.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a non-invasive window into the excitatory circuits involved in human motor behavior.Experimental brain research · 2020Review
- Breaking down the human motor cortex: the layer-specific measurement of corticospinal neuronal activity.The Journal of physiology · 2019Article
- Excitability of Upper Layer Circuits Relates to Torque Output in Humans.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsThe first indirect (I) corticospinal volley from stimulation of the motor cortex consists of two parts: one that originates from infragranular layer 5 and a subsequent part with a delay of 0.6 ms to which supragranular layers contribute. Non-invasive probing of these two parts was performed in humans using a refined electrophysiological method involving transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation. Activity modulation of these two parts during a sensorimotor discrimination task was consistent with previous results in monkeys obtained with laminar recordings. ABSTRACT: Circuits in superficial and deep layers play distinct roles in cortical computation, but current methods to study them in humans are limited. Here, we developed a novel approach for non-invasive assessment of layer-specific activity in the human motor cortex. We first conducted brain slice and in vivo experiments on monkey motor cortex to investigate the output timing from layer 5 (including corticospinal neurons) following extracellular stimulation. Neuron responses contained cyclical waves. The first wave was composed of two parts: the earliest part originated only from stimulation of layer 5; after 0.6 ms, stimuli to superficial layers 2/3 could also contribute. In healthy humans we then assessed different parts of the first corticospinal volley elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), by interacting TMS with stimulation of the median nerve generating an H-reflex. By adjusting the delay between stimuli, we could assess the earliest volley evoked by TMS, and the part 0.6 ms later. Measurements were made while subjects performed a visuo-motor discrimination task, which has been previously shown in monkey to modulate superficial motor cortical cells selectively depending on task difficulty. We showed a similar selective modulation of the later part of the TMS volley, as expected if this part of the volley is sensitive to superficial cortical excitability. We conclude that it is possible to segregate different cortical circuits which may refer to different motor cortex layers in humans, by exploiting small time differences in the corticospinal volleys evoked by non-invasive stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.