ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2019
Automated Fundus Image Quality Assessment in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review of current algorithms.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Pooled it
- Addressing the Third Epidemic of Retinopathy of Prematurity Through Telemedicine and Technology: A Systematic Review.Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismusPooled it
- Key factors in a rigorous longitudinal image-based assessment of retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Beyond Performance Metrics: Automatic Deep Learning Retinal OCT Analysis Reproduces Clinical Trial Outcome.Ophthalmology · 2020Trial
- Time Series Segmentation in Adaptive Optics Ophthalmoscopy With Application to Flicker-Induced Vasodilation.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based no-reference quality assessment of anterior segment ultrasound biomicroscopy panoramic images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning image quality feedback system for infant fundus photography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Retinopathy of Prematurity From 2010 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Article
- A fundus image dataset for intelligent retinopathy of prematurity system.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Identifies High-Quality Fundus Photographs and Increases Accuracy in Automated Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Detection.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Quality assessment of colour fundus and fluorescein angiography images using deep learning.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- DeepQuality improves infant retinopathy screening.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Pre-training via Transfer Learning and Pretext Learning a Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Assessments of Clinical PET Image Quality.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023Article
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening in Nepal and Mongolia.Ophthalmology science · 2022Article
- Variability in Plus Disease Diagnosis using Single and Serial Images.Ophthalmology. Retina · 2022Article
- External Validation of a Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Model Using Artificial Intelligence in 3 Low- and Middle-Income Populations.JAMA ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Deepfakes in Ophthalmology: Applications and Realism of Synthetic Retinal Images from Generative Adversarial Networks.Ophthalmology science · 2021Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Pre-Diagnosis Assessment Module for Retinal Photographs: A Multicenter Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Applications of interpretability in deep learning models for ophthalmology.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate image-based ophthalmic diagnosis relies on fundus image clarity. This has important implications for the quality of ophthalmic diagnoses and for emerging methods such as telemedicine and computer-based image analysis. The purpose of this study was to implement a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated assessment of fundus image quality in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
designExperimental study.
participantsRetinal fundus images were collected from preterm infants during routine ROP screenings.
methodsSix thousand one hundred thirty-nine retinal fundus images were collected from 9 academic institutions. Each image was graded for quality (acceptable quality [AQ], possibly acceptable quality [PAQ], or not acceptable quality [NAQ]) by 3 independent experts. Quality was defined as the ability to assess an image confidently for the presence of ROP. Of the 6139 images, NAQ, PAQ, and AQ images represented 5.6%, 43.6%, and 50.8% of the image set, respectively. Because of low representation of NAQ images in the data set, images labeled NAQ were grouped into the PAQ category, and a binary CNN classifier was trained using 5-fold cross-validation on 4000 images. A test set of 2109 images was held out for final model evaluation. Additionally, 30 images were ranked from worst to best quality by 6 experts via pairwise comparisons, and the CNN's ability to rank quality, regardless of quality classification, was assessed.
main outcome measuresThe CNN performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A Spearman's rank correlation was calculated to evaluate the overall ability of the CNN to rank images from worst to best quality as compared with experts.
resultsThe mean AUC for 5-fold cross-validation was 0.958 (standard deviation, 0.005) for the diagnosis of AQ versus PAQ images. The AUC was 0.965 for the test set. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient on the set of 30 images was 0.90 as compared with the overall expert consensus ranking.
conclusionsThis model accurately assessed retinal fundus image quality in a comparable manner with that of experts. This fully automated model has potential for application in clinical settings, telemedicine, and computer-based image analysis in ROP and for generalizability to other ophthalmic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.