Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31044738›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2019

Automated Fundus Image Quality Assessment in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Aaron S Coyner, Ryan Swan, J Peter Campbell, Susan Ostmo, James M Brown, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Sang Jin Kim, Karyn E Jonas, R V Paul Chan, Michael F Chiang and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron S CoynerDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Ryan SwanDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Peter CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Susan OstmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
James M BrownDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sang Jin KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Karyn E JonasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
R V Paul ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: chiangm@ohsu.edu.
Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity Research Consortium
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI John Peter Campbell · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
Translational Vision Science Research at Oregon Health & Science UniversityT32EY023211 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Yali Jia, Kate E Keller · 2013 to 2026
$2.4M
Mentored Vision Clinician-Scientist Program at OHSUK12EY027720 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
Clinical and genetic analysis of retinopathy of prematurityR01HD107493 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2021 to 2023
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NEI NIH HHS K12 EY027720NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474NEI NIH HHS T32 EY023211NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107493NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate image-based ophthalmic diagnosis relies on fundus image clarity. This has important implications for the quality of ophthalmic diagnoses and for emerging methods such as telemedicine and computer-based image analysis. The purpose of this study was to implement a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated assessment of fundus image quality in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

designExperimental study.

participantsRetinal fundus images were collected from preterm infants during routine ROP screenings.

methodsSix thousand one hundred thirty-nine retinal fundus images were collected from 9 academic institutions. Each image was graded for quality (acceptable quality [AQ], possibly acceptable quality [PAQ], or not acceptable quality [NAQ]) by 3 independent experts. Quality was defined as the ability to assess an image confidently for the presence of ROP. Of the 6139 images, NAQ, PAQ, and AQ images represented 5.6%, 43.6%, and 50.8% of the image set, respectively. Because of low representation of NAQ images in the data set, images labeled NAQ were grouped into the PAQ category, and a binary CNN classifier was trained using 5-fold cross-validation on 4000 images. A test set of 2109 images was held out for final model evaluation. Additionally, 30 images were ranked from worst to best quality by 6 experts via pairwise comparisons, and the CNN's ability to rank quality, regardless of quality classification, was assessed.

main outcome measuresThe CNN performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A Spearman's rank correlation was calculated to evaluate the overall ability of the CNN to rank images from worst to best quality as compared with experts.

resultsThe mean AUC for 5-fold cross-validation was 0.958 (standard deviation, 0.005) for the diagnosis of AQ versus PAQ images. The AUC was 0.965 for the test set. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient on the set of 30 images was 0.90 as compared with the overall expert consensus ranking.

conclusionsThis model accurately assessed retinal fundus image quality in a comparable manner with that of experts. This fully automated model has potential for application in clinical settings, telemedicine, and computer-based image analysis in ROP and for generalizability to other ophthalmic diseases.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfant, NewbornMaleOphthalmoscopyRetinopathy of PrematurityROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID31044738
PMCPMC6501831
OpenAlexW2914111267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.