Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31044697›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2019

Preimplant Hearing Aid Fittings and Aided Audibility for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Alissa Nickerson, Lisa S Davidson, Rosalie M Uchanski

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alissa NickersonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL.
Lisa S DavidsonProgram in Audiology and Communication Science, St. Louis, MO.
Rosalie M UchanskiProgram in Audiology and Communication Science, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

THE EFFECTS OF EARLY ACOUSTIC HEARING FOR PEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTSR01DC012778 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Lisa Surber Davidson · 2013 to 2026
$6.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING FOR CLINICAL AUDIOLOGISTST35DC008765 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, WILLIAM WALTER · 2008 to 2018
$369k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012778NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAudibility of speech for children with hearing loss (HL) depends on the degree of HL and the fitting of the hearing aids (HAs) themselves. Many studies on cochlear implant (CI) users have demonstrated that preimplant hearing is associated with postimplant outcomes, but there have been very few reports on the fitting of HAs before surgery. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to characterize HA fittings and aided audibility of speech for pediatric HA users with severe to profound HL and to examine the relation between preimplant aided audibility and postimplant speech perception. RESEARCH

designA descriptive/observational and correlational study. Audiologic records of pediatric CI participants involved in a larger study examining the effects of early acoustic hearing were analyzed retrospectively; when available, these records included HA verification and speech recognition performance. STUDY SAMPLE: The CI participants were enrolled in audiology centers and oral schools for the deaf across the United States. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: To determine whether deviations from prescribed DSL target were significantly greater than zero, 95% confidence intervals of the mean deviation were calculated for each frequency (250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz). Correlational analyses were used to examine the relationship between preimplant aided Speech Intelligibility Indices (SIIs) and postimplant speech perception in noise. Correlational analyses were also used to explore the relationship between preimplant aided SIIs and demographic data. T-tests were used to compare preimplant-aided SIIs of HAs of listeners who later became users of either sequential CIs, simultaneous CIs, or bimodal devices.

resultsPreimplant fittings of HAs were generally very close to prescriptive targets, except at 4000 Hz for those HAs with active frequency-lowering processing, and preimplant SIIs, albeit low, were correlated with postimplant speech recognition performance in noise. These results suggest that aided audibility should be maximized throughout the HA trial for later speech recognition purposes.

conclusionsIt is recommended that HA fittings be optimized to support speech audibility even when considering implantation. In addition to the age at which HA use begins, the aided audibility itself is important in determining CI candidacy and decisions regarding bimodal HA use.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing AidsChildChild, PreschoolCorrelation of DataFemaleHearing LossHumansMalePreoperative PeriodRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31044697
PMCPMC6750978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.