ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021
Left ventricle function assessment using gated first-pass
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid cardiovascular imaging. A clinical consensus statement of the european association of nuclear medicine (EANM) and the european association of cardiovascular imaging (EACVI) of the ESC.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Tales from the future-nuclear cardio-oncology, from prediction to diagnosis and monitoring.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Review
- LV functional evaluation onJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- First-pass cardiac PET: Potentiality and limitations.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Assessment of left and right ventricular functional parameters using dynamic dual-tracer [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Shining Damaged Hearts: Immunotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity in the Spotlight of Nuclear Cardiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Equilibrium radionuclide angiography: Present and future.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Innovative procedure for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction fromEJNMMI physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe appraised the feasibility of left ventricle (LV) function assessment using gated first-pass MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four oncologic patients benefited from
resultsPseudo-planar PET EF estimates were concordant with planar ERNA (ccc = 0.81, P < .001) with a bias of 0% (95% CI [- 2%; 3%], limits of agreement [- 11%; 12%]). Reproducibility was excellent and similar for both methods (CoV = 2 ± 1% and 3 ± 2%, P = NS; ICC = 0.97 and 0.92, for PET and ERNA, respectively). Measurements obtained in fully-tomographic mode were concordant with SPECT ERNA: ccc = 0.83 and bias = - 3 mL for LV EDV, ccc = 0.92 and bias = 0 mL for LV ESV, ccc = 0.89 and bias = - 1% for LV EF (all P values < .001 for ccc, all biases not significant).
conclusionsGated first-pass
Indexed as
Identifiers
31044403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.