ArticleEndocrine2019
True MEN1 or phenocopy? Evidence for geno-phenotypic correlations in MEN1 syndrome.
Article in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical challenge of MEN1 phenocopies: insights from a multicentric national retrospective study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Role of MEN1 mutations on postoperative outcomes of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related primary hyperparathyroidism: a single center experience.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Current Medical Controversies in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Familial MEN1 Syndrome with Atypical Renal Features and a Coexisting CLDN16 Variant: A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Genotype-phenotype correlation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Genetic Testing of Endocrine Tumor Patients Using a Comprehensive Hereditary Cancer Gene Panel.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Article
- Familial MEN1 Syndrome Diagnosed on Functional Imaging: A Case Report with Clinical and Genetic Correlation.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Optimized minimal genome-wide human sgRNA library.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Syndrome Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Genotype/Phenotype: Is There Any Advance on Predicting or Preventing?Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Cutaneous lesions and other non-endocrine manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Reconstructed glycosylase base editors GBE2.0 with enhanced C-to-G base editing efficiency and purity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022Article
- Molecular genetic testing strategies used in diagnostic flow for hereditary endocrine tumour syndromes.Endocrine · 2021Review
- Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 revealed by a hip pathologic fracture.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- A Direct Comparison of Patients With Hereditary and Sporadic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evaluation of Clinical Course, Prognostic Factors and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Observational
- Understanding the clinical course of genotype-negative MEN1 patients can inform management strategies.Surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Features of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and 2A in a Patient with BothJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020Article
- Phenotypes Associated With MEN1 Syndrome: A Focus on Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Using Structural AnalysisJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is a rare tumor syndrome caused by germline mutations of MEN1 gene. Phenotype varies widely, and no definitive correlation with the genotype has been observed. Mutation-negative patients with MEN1-associated tumors represent phenocopies. By comparing mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients, we aimed to identify phenotype features predictive for a positive genetic test and to evaluate the role of MEN1 mutations in phenotype modulation.
methodsMutation screeening of MEN1 gene by Sanger sequencing and assessment of clinical data of 189 consecutively enrolled probands and relatives were performed at our national and European Reference Center. Multiple ligation probe amplification analysis of MEN1 gene and Sanger sequencing of CDKN1B were carried out in clinically suspicious but MEN1-negative cases.
resultsTwenty-seven probands and twenty family members carried MEN1 mutations. Five mutations have not been described earlier. Pronouncedly high number of phenocopies (>70%) was observed. Clinical suspicion of MEN1 syndrome emerged at significantly earlier age in MEN1-positive compared to MEN1-negative probands. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors developed significantly earlier and more frequently in carriers compared to non-carriers. Probands with high-impact (frameshift, nonsense, large deletions) mutations, predicted to affect menin function significantly, developed GEP-NETs more frequently compared to low-impact (inframe and missense) mutation carriers.
conclusionsMEN1 phenocopy is common and represents a significant confounder for the genetic testing. GEP-NET under 30 years best predicted a MEN1 mutation. The present study thus confirmed a previous proposal and suggested that GEP-NET under 30 years should be considered as a part of the indication criteria for MEN1 mutational analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.