Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31044358›Full record

ArticleBiological trace element research2020

Biomonitoring of Heavy Metals in River Ganga Water, Sediments, Plant, and Fishes of Different Trophic Levels.

Manoj Kumar, Neelima Gupta, Arun Ratn, Yashika Awasthi, Rajesh Prasad, Abha Trivedi, Sunil P Trivedi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological trace element research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The potential of using Cedrus atlantica as a biomonitor in the concentrations of Cr and Mn.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manoj KumarEnvironmental Toxicology & Bioremediation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, 226007, Lucknow, India.
Neelima GuptaC.S.J.M. University, Kanpur, India.
Arun RatnEnvironmental Toxicology & Bioremediation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, 226007, Lucknow, India.
Yashika AwasthiEnvironmental Toxicology & Bioremediation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, 226007, Lucknow, India.
Rajesh PrasadEnvironmental Toxicology & Bioremediation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, 226007, Lucknow, India.
Abha TrivediDepartment of Animal Science, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, India.
Sunil P TrivediEnvironmental Toxicology & Bioremediation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, 226007, Lucknow, India. sat060523@gmail.com.
University of Lucknow · INChhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University · INM.J.P. Rohilkhand University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the pattern of metals concentration in water, sediment, plants, and three edible fish species (Channa striata, Labeo rohita, and Catla catla) of different trophic levels, captured from Jajmau (Kanpur), an important fishery area of river Ganga in Uttar Pradesh, India was examined. The heavy metals, Ni, Pb, Fe, Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, and Co, were estimated in the liver, kidney, muscles, and gill tissues of abovesaid species of fish. The highest metal concentration was reported in the bottom feeder fish as compared with the column and surface feeders. The result obtained after analysis of water sample reflects the order of occurrence of heavy metals as Fe > Cr > Pb > Ni > Cd > Zn > Cu > Co. Sediments analysis indicates high concentration of Fe and Cr, making the entire environment from top to bottom, stressful. Target hazard quotient (THQ) and hazard index (HI) of the three species suggest a potential risk to the health of consumers, the humans. Thus, it is inevitable that the river Ganga should be closely monitored to safeguard human health. Graphical Abstract.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFishesFood ChainFood ContaminationFresh WaterGeologic SedimentsGillsHumansIndiaKidneyLiverMetals, HeavyMusclesPlantsRiversMetals, HeavyFish and the gangaGillsKidneyLiverMetal-concentrationMuscles

Identifiers

PMID31044358
OpenAlexW2943385262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.