ArticleJournal of fluorescence2019
Beacons Contribute Valuable Empirical Information to Theoretical 3-D Aptamer-Peptide Binding.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Rapid and Affordable Diagnostic Testing for Respiratory Infectious Diseases: Evaluation of Aptamer Beacon Technology for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of SAR-CoV-2 in Breath Condensate.Journal of fluorescence · 2024Article
- Successes and Failures of Static Aptamer-Target 3D Docking Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA aptamers were developed against five different peptides from the known binding regions of anti-Cytomegalovirus and anti-Herpes Simplex Virus-2 antibodies and the aptamers were ranked by relative affinity based on an ELISA-like (ELASA) microplate assay. The secondary structures of the top five highest affinity aptamers were studied for stem-loop commonalities and the most probable peptide binding sites. Two of these stem-loop structures were converted into beacons by addition of TYE 665 dye on the 5' end and Iowa Black quencher on the 3' end. When competed against increasing concentrations of each of the five peptides, only three of the possible ten interactions demonstrated "lights on" fluorescence beacon responses. When modeled by generation of PDB files, after passage through PATCHDOCK and YASARA, two of the aptamer beacon-peptide interactions showed no theoretical evidence of separating the G-C stem-loop region, despite clear empirical evidence of separation of the fluorophore and quencher beyond the Förster distance leading to abundant fluorescence. And in the second beacon's case, YASARA modeling suggested that the beacon was always open despite clear empirical evidence that it was not (no fluorescence response) and only opened in the presence of one of the five peptides. These results are interpreted as a demonstration that 3-dimensional docking software such as PATCHDOCK and YASARA, which are based on rigid receptor-ligand shape complementarity may not reflect the "induced-fit" interactions between aptamers and their cognate targets. Therefore, for the most complete and accurate picture of aptamer-peptide binding, several theoretical and empirical (e.g., beacon fluorescence) analysis methods may be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31044327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.