Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31044322›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2019

Global Health and Epilepsy: Update and Future Directions.

Mary C Spiciarich, Jane R von Gaudecker, Laura Jurasek, Dave F Clarke, Jorge Burneo, Jorge Vidaurre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment gaps in epilepsy.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary C SpiciarichDepartment of Neurology, Division of Child Neurology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, USA. mcs2287@cumc.columbia.edu.
Jane R von GaudeckerIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Laura JurasekStollery Children's Hospital and the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dave F ClarkeBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jorge BurneoWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jorge VidaurreNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEfforts to improve epilepsy care outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are occurring through global health work. Despite an increase in these efforts, several barriers exist and a significant epilepsy treatment gap remains. This paper will review barriers to epilepsy care in LMICs and summarize recent published and unpublished data about global health projects which aimed to improve epilepsy care in these regions, focusing on work in the past 5 years. RECENT

findingsThere are multiple recent and ongoing projects including clinical, research, education, and advocacy programs. We conclude that collaborative efforts are necessary in order to develop long-term and sustainable projects. The creation of a database and a formal method of communication between stakeholders can contribute to improving the efficiency and impact of global health efforts in epilepsy.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEpilepsyForecastingGlobal HealthHumansDisparityEpilepsyGlobal health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.