Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31044320›Full record

Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

The neuromodulatory effect of tDCS in patients affected by functional motor symptoms: an exploratory study.

Benedetta Demartini, Roberto Volpe, Giulia Mattavelli, Diana Goeta, Armando D'Agostino, Orsola Gambini

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benedetta DemartiniDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Universita' degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. benedetta.demartini@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4426-6014
Roberto VolpeDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Universita' degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giulia MattavelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Diana GoetaDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Universita' degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Armando D'AgostinoDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Universita' degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Orsola GambiniDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Universita' degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITAOL (United States) · USUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have shown how emotional and cognitive factors might combine together to determine the onset and maintenance of functional motor symptoms (FMS). Nevertheless, no studies have assessed whether brain circuits involved in regulation and processing of emotions and attention might be influenced by neuromodulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single anodic tDCS session over the right posterior parietal cortex in subjects with FMS and in healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND

methodsNine patients and seven healthy subjects underwent two sessions of tDCS (real and sham), in a randomized order. At the end of each session, all participants underwent the heart beat detection task (interoceptive sensitivity) and the Posner paradigm (spatial attention).

resultsAfter sham stimulation, patients with FMS showed significantly lower interoceptive sensitivity and greater cueing effect for reaction times at the Posner paradigm than healthy controls. There was a significant improvement between the levels of interoceptive sensitivity after real and sham stimulation in the whole group of participants and in the group of patients with FMS.

conclusionsOur study provides first indications for a neuromodulatory effect of a single anodic tDCS session over the right posterior parietal cortex on interoceptive sensitivity in subjects with FMS.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAgedAttentionDyskinesiasFemaleHumansInteroceptionMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionConversion disordersFunctional motor symptomsNeuromodulationTranscranial direct-current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31044320
OpenAlexW2943610538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.