ArticleJournal of public health research2019
Where else would I look for it? A five-country qualitative study on purposes, strategies, and consequences of online health information seeking.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mediating and moderating role of COVID-19 coping attitudes in the relationship between coronavirus anxiety and cyberchondria.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on multidimensional learning and person-centred care: interviews with persons living with type 2 diabetes.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Early Follow-up of Parents by a Specialized Cleft Nurse After the Birth of an Infant with Cleft lip and/or Palate.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024Article
- Assessing Credibility: Quality Criteria for Patients, Caregivers, and the Public in Online Health Information-A Qualitative Study.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Supporting Collaboration in Rehabilitation Trajectories With Information and Communication Technologies: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Do health literacy levels of nursing students change throughout the study programme? A cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Qualitative study: patients' enduring concerns about discussing internet use in general practice consultations.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens' perspective: A scoping review.PloS one · 2021Article
- Personalized medicine, digital technology and trust: a Kantian account.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2020Article
- Exploring eHealth Literacy and Patient-Reported Experiences With Outpatient Care in the Hungarian General Adult Population: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Google Medical Update: Why Is the Search Engine Decreasing Visibility of Health and Medical Information Websites?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Communication on drug safety-related matters to patients: is it even more significant in this digital era?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnline health information (OHI) is widely available and consulted by many people in Western countries to gain health advice. The main goal of the present study is to provide a detailed account of the experiences among people from various demographic backgrounds living in high-income countries, who have used OHI. DESIGN AND
methodsThematic analysis of 165 qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted among OHI users residing in Australia, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland was performed.
resultsThe lived experience of people using OHI seem not to differ across countries. The interviews show that searches for OHI are motivated from curiosity, sharing of experiences, or affirmation for actions already taken. Most people find it difficult to appraise the information, leading them to cross-check sources or discuss OHI with others. OHI seems to impact mostly some specific types of health behaviors, such as changes in diet or physical activity, while it only plays a complementary role for more serious health concerns. Participants often check OHI before seeing their GP, but are reluctant to discuss online content with health care personnel due to expected negative reception.
conclusionsThis study adds to the body of knowledge on eHealth literacy by demonstrating how OHI affects overall health behavior, strengthens patients' ability to understand, live with, and prepare themselves for diverse health challenges. The increasing digitalization of health communication and health care calls for further research on digital divides and patient-professional relations. Health care professionals should acknowledge OHI seeking and engage in discussions with patients to enable them to appreciate OHI, and to support shared decision making in health care. The professionals can utilize patient's desire to learn as a resource for health prevention, promotion or treatment, and empowerment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.